On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 04:04:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 07:01:38AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: >> I share the same understanding and I think those can be removed. >> >> The patch LGTM. > > That sounds about right. All the volatile references we have here > have been kept under the assumption that a memory barrier is required. > As we hold spin locks in these areas, that should not be necessary > anyway. So LGTM as well.
Committed, thanks. -- nathan
