On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 16:21 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > So, I got a feeling that adding this to the rmgr interface is not > quite > right. The rmgr callbacks are for things that run when WAL is > *replayed*, while checkpoints are related to how WAL is generated. > Let's > design this as an independent hook, separate from rmgrs.
That's a good way to look at it, agreed.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
