On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 5:56 PM Kirill Reshke <reshkekir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +/*
> > + * If the tuple to be modified could not be found, a log message is
> > emitted.
> > + */
> > +static void
> > +report_tuple_not_found(CmdType cmd, Relation targetrel, bool is_partition)
> > +{
> > + Assert(cmd == CMD_UPDATE || cmd == CMD_DELETE);
> > +
> > + /* XXX should this be promoted to ereport(LOG) perhaps? */
> > + elog(DEBUG1,
> > + "logical replication did not find row to be %s in replication target
> > relation%s \"%s\"",
> > + cmd == CMD_UPDATE ? "updated" : "deleted",
> > + is_partition ? "'s partition" : "",
> > + RelationGetRelationName(targetrel));
> > +}
>
> Encapsulating report logic inside function is ok,
>
This could even be a separate patch as it is not directly to other
parts of the 0002 patch. BTW, the problem statement for 0002 is not
explicitly stated like which part of the code we want to optimize by
removing duplication. Also, as proposed the name
apply_handle_tuple_routing() for the function doesn't seem suitable as
it no longer remains similar to other apply_handle_* functions where
we perform the required operation like insert or update the tuple. How
about naming it as apply_tuple_routing()?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
