RE: Partial aggregates pushdown

[fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp]

> From: Fujii Yuki <fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 6:42 AM
> Hi hackers.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:15?AM fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp 
> <fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp> wrote:
> >   Requirement2. Consider appropriate position of the new keyword 
> > "PARTIAL_AGGREGATE". (with Robert)
> >     Existing patch: Before the target expression. Ex. avg(PARTIAL_AGGREGATE 
> > c1)
> >     Ideal: Before the aggregate function. Ex. PARTIAL_AGGREGATE avg(c1)
> >   Requirement3. Consider to avoid to make the new keyword 
> > "PARTIAL_AGGREGATE" become a reserved word. (with
> Robert)
> >     In the existing patch, "PARTIAL_AGGREGATE" is a reserved word.
> I considered the above two requirement.
> Based on my research, there is no way to use PARTIAL_AGGREGATE in front of a 
> function name without making it a
> reserved word.
With this way, I couldn't resolve shift/reduce conflicts.