On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 05:41:12PM +0000, Amonson, Paul D wrote: > > It would be good to know exactly what, if any, changes the Intel > > lawyers want us to make to our license if we accept this patch. > > I asked about this and there is nothing Intel requires here license > wise. They believe that there is nothing wrong with including Clause-3 > BSD like licenses under the PostgreSQL license. They only specified > that for the source file, the applying license need to be present > either as a link (which was previously discouraged in this thread) > or the full text. Please note that I checked and for this specific > Chromium license there is not SPDX codename so the entire text is > required.
Okay, that is very interesting. Yes, we will have no problem reproducing the exact license text in the source code. I think we can remove the license issue as a blocker for this patch. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
