> Hmm, I wonder if the "(c) 2024 Intel" line is going to bring us trouble. > (I bet it's not really necessary anyway.)
Our lawyer agrees, copyright is covered by the "PostgreSQL Global Development Group" copyright line as a contributor. > And this bit doesn't look good. The LICENSE file says: ... > > // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above > > // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following > > disclaimer // in the documentation and/or other materials provided > > with the // distribution. ... > The second clause essentially says we would have to add a page to our > "documentation and/or other materials" with the contents of the license file. According to one of Intel’s lawyers, 55 instances of this clause was found when they searched in the PostgreSQL repository. Therefore, I assume that this obligation has either been satisfied or determined not to apply, given that the second BSD clause already appears in the PostgreSQL source tree. I might have misunderstood the concern, but the lawyer believes this is a non-issue. Could you please provide more clarifying details about the concern? Thanks, Paul
0002-v4-Fix-Copyright-and-Licensing-issues.patch
Description: 0002-v4-Fix-Copyright-and-Licensing-issues.patch
0001-v4-Feat-Add-AVX512-crc32c-algorithm-to-postgres.patch
Description: 0001-v4-Feat-Add-AVX512-crc32c-algorithm-to-postgres.patch
