On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 7:37 PM Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 12:34, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > You're right. No sense trying to fix this. Reverted. > > I just noticed that this revert (commit 6377e12a) seems to have > introduced two comment blocks atop TableAmRoutine's > scan_analyze_next_block, and I can't find a clear reason why these are > two separate comment blocks. > Furthermore, both comment blocks seemingly talk about different > implementations of a block-based analyze functionality, and I don't > have the time to analyze which of these comments is authorative and > which are misplaced or obsolete.
Thank you, I've just removed the first comment. It contains heap-specific information and has been copied here from heapam_scan_analyze_next_block(). ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
