On Sun, 26 May 2024 at 15:57, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Agreed. I changed it to: > > Allow btree indexes to more efficiently find a set of values, such as > those supplied by IN subqueries > > Is that good?
I think this needs further adjustment. An "IN subquery" is an IN clause which contains a subquery. As far as I understand it, 5bf748b86 does nothing to improve those. It's there to improve IN with a set of values such as IN(1,2,3). Maybe "IN subqueries" can be replaced with "an SQL IN clause". David
