Hi, On 2024-05-15 11:14:14 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2024-May-15, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > > > It looks like with the use of the new multi insert table access method > > (TAM) for COPY (v20-0005), pgbench regressed about 35% [1]. > > Where does this acronym "TAM" comes from for "table access method"? I > find it thoroughly horrible and wish we didn't use it. What's wrong > with using "table AM"? It's not that much longer, much clearer and > reuses our well-established acronym AM.
Strongly agreed. I don't know why I dislike TAM so much though. Greetings, Andres Freund
