Sorry to interject, but -- On 2024-May-15, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> It looks like with the use of the new multi insert table access method > (TAM) for COPY (v20-0005), pgbench regressed about 35% [1]. Where does this acronym "TAM" comes from for "table access method"? I find it thoroughly horrible and wish we didn't use it. What's wrong with using "table AM"? It's not that much longer, much clearer and reuses our well-established acronym AM. We don't use IAM anywhere, for example (it's always "index AM"), and I don't think we'd turn "sequence AM" into SAM either, would we? -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
