On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:17 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is difficult to imagine a world in which we have both requiredirect > and forcedirect and people are not confused.
Yeah... Any thoughts on a better scheme? require_auth was meant to lock down overly general authentication; maybe a require_proto or something could do the same for the transport? I hate that we have so many options that most people don't need but take precedence, especially when they're based on the existence of magic third-party environmental cues (e.g. Kerberos caches). And it was nice that we got sslrootcert=system to turn on strong security and reject nonsensical combinations. If someone sets `requiredirect` and leaves the default sslmode, or chooses a weaker one... Is that really useful to someone? --Jacob
