Hi, Thanks for replying this.
In <02cccd36-3083-4a50-aae4-f957e96fb...@eisentraut.org> "Re: Is it acceptable making COPY format extendable?" on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:57:38 +0200, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> I'm proposing a patch that making COPY format extendable: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20231204.153548.2126325458835528809.kou%40clear-code.com >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4681/ >> >> But my proposal stalled. It it acceptable the feature >> request that making COPY format extendable? If it's not >> acceptable, what are blockers? Performance? > > I think that thread is getting an adequate amount of attention. Of > course, you can always wish for more, but "stalled" looks very > different. Sorry for "stalled" misuse. I haven't got any reply since 2024-03-15: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20240315.173754.2049843193122381085.kou%40clear-code.com#07aefc636d8165204ddfba971dc9a490 (I sent some pings.) So I called this status as "stalled". I'm not familiar with the PostgreSQL's development style. What should I do for this case? Should I just wait for a reply from others without doing anything? > Let's not start a new thread here to discuss the merits of the other > thread; that discussion belongs there. I wanted to discuss possibility for this feature request in this thread. I wanted to use my existing thread is for how to implement this feature request. Should I reuse https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAJ7c6TM6Bz1c3F04Cy6%2BSzuWfKmr0kU8c_3Stnvh_8BR0D6k8Q%40mail.gmail.com for it instead of this thread? Thanks, -- kou
