On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:26:49AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:30 AM Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >> I think Michael's point was that if we carry the code we should test we >> can run it. The other possibility would be just to remove it. I can see >> arguments for both. > > Hm. If it's not acceptable to carry this (as a worse-is-better smoke > test) without also running it during tests, then my personal vote > would be to tear it out and just have people write/contribute targeted > benchmarks when they end up working on performance. I don't think the > cost/benefit makes sense at that point.
And you may catch up a couple of bugs while on it. In my experience, things with custom makefile and/or meson rules tend to rot easily because everybody forgets about them. There are a few of them in the tree that could be ripped off, as well.. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
