On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:22 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:08 AM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:22 PM Bertrand Drouvot > > <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 3) > > > update_synced_slots_inactive_time(): > > > > > > This assert is removed, is it intentional? > > > Assert(s->active_pid == 0); > > > > Yes, the slot can get acquired in the corner case when someone runs > > pg_sync_replication_slots concurrently at this time. I'm referring to > > the issue reported upthread. We don't prevent one running > > pg_sync_replication_slots in promotion/ShutDownSlotSync phase right? > > Maybe we should prevent that otherwise some of the slots are synced > > and the standby gets promoted while others are yet-to-be-synced. > > > > We should do something about it but that shouldn't be done in this > patch. We can handle it separately and then add such an assert.
Agreed. Once this patch is concluded, I can fix the slot sync shutdown issue and will also add this 'assert' back. thanks Shveta
