On 2024-Mar-14, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 20:08, Jacob Champion > <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > I hit this on my machine. With the attached diff I can reproduce > > constantly (including with the most recent test patch); I think the > > cancel must be arriving between the bind/execute steps? > > Nice find! Your explanation makes total sense. Attached a patchset > that fixes/works around this issue by using the simple query protocol > in the cancel test.
Hmm, isn't this basically saying that we're giving up on reliably canceling queries altogether? I mean, maybe we'd like to instead fix the bug about canceling queries in extended query protocol ... Isn't that something you're worried about? -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)
