Hi!

On 07.03.2024 17:51, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Hi!

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 9:59 AM Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepik...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On 5/3/2024 12:30, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> > On 4/3/2024 09:26, jian he wrote:
> ... and the new version of the patchset is attached.

I made some revisions for the patchset.
1) Use hash_combine() to combine hash values.
2) Upper limit the number of array elements by MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE.
3) Better save the original order of clauses by putting hash entries and untransformable clauses to the same list.  A lot of differences in regression tests output have gone.
Thank you for your changes. I agree with them.

One important issue I found.

# create table t as (select i::int%100 i from generate_series(1,10000) i);
# analyze t;
# explain select * from t where i = 1 or i = 1;
                     QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on t  (cost=0.00..189.00 rows=200 width=4)
   Filter: (i = ANY ('{1,1}'::integer[]))
(2 rows)

# set enable_or_transformation = false;
SET
# explain select * from t where i = 1 or i = 1;
                     QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on t  (cost=0.00..189.00 rows=100 width=4)
   Filter: (i = 1)
(2 rows)

We don't make array values unique.  That might make query execution performance somewhat worse, and also makes selectivity estimation worse.  I suggest Andrei and/or Alena should implement making array values unique.


I have corrected this and some spelling mistakes. The unique_any_elements_change.no-cfbot file contains changes.

While I was correcting the test results caused by such changes, I noticed that the same behavior was when converting the IN expression,
and this can be seen in the result of the regression test:

 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT unique2 FROM onek2
 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A', 'A') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'A');
                                QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
    Recheck Cond: (stringu1 < 'B'::name)
   Filter: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{A,A}'::name[])) AND (stringu1 = 'A'::name))
    ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
 (4 rows)

--
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
diff --git a/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c b/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c
index baeb83e58b..e9813ef6ab 100644
--- a/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c
+++ b/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c
@@ -312,8 +312,8 @@ TransformOrExprToANY(ParseState *pstate, List *args, int 
location)
 
                if (unlikely(found))
                {
-                       entry->consts = lappend(entry->consts, const_expr);
-                       entry->exprs = lappend(entry->exprs, orqual);
+                       entry->consts = list_append_unique(entry->consts, 
const_expr);
+                       entry->exprs = list_append_unique(entry->exprs, orqual);
                }
                else
                {
@@ -352,7 +352,6 @@ TransformOrExprToANY(ParseState *pstate, List *args, int 
location)
                entry = (OrClauseGroupEntry *) lfirst(lc);
 
                Assert(list_length(entry->consts) > 0);
-               Assert(list_length(entry->exprs) == list_length(entry->consts));
 
                if (list_length(entry->consts) == 1 ||
                        list_length(entry->consts) > MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE)
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out 
b/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out
index 7b721bac71..606a4399f9 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out
@@ -1915,16 +1915,16 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
   WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand < 42 OR thousand < 99 OR 43 > thousand OR 
42 > thousand);
-                                        QUERY PLAN                             
           
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+                                      QUERY PLAN                               
        
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Aggregate
    ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
-         Recheck Cond: ((hundred = 42) AND (thousand < ANY 
('{42,99,43,42}'::integer[])))
+         Recheck Cond: ((hundred = 42) AND (thousand < ANY 
('{42,99,43}'::integer[])))
          ->  BitmapAnd
                ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_hundred
                      Index Cond: (hundred = 42)
                ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
-                     Index Cond: (thousand < ANY ('{42,99,43,42}'::integer[]))
+                     Index Cond: (thousand < ANY ('{42,99,43}'::integer[]))
 (8 rows)
 
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/select.out 
b/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
index 0ebaf002e8..f4f5493c43 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
@@ -1047,11 +1047,11 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A', 'J', 
'C');
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT unique2 FROM onek2
 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A', 'A') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'A');
-                                      QUERY PLAN                               
        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+                                QUERY PLAN                                 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
    Recheck Cond: (stringu1 < 'B'::name)
-   Filter: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{A,A}'::name[])) AND (stringu1 = ANY 
('{A,A}'::name[])))
+   Filter: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{A,A}'::name[])) AND (stringu1 = 'A'::name))
    ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
 (4 rows)
 
@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ WHERE unique1 IN ((random()*2)::integer, 
(random()*3)::integer);
    Filter: (unique1 = ANY (ARRAY[((random() * '2'::double 
precision))::integer, ((random() * '3'::double precision))::integer]))
 (2 rows)
 
--- Combine different saops. Soe of them doesnt' fit a set of partial indexes,
+-- Combine different saops. Some of them doesnt' fit a set of partial indexes,
 -- but other fits.
 -- Unfortunately, we don't combine saop and OR clauses so far.
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ WHERE (unique1 < 1 OR stringu1 IN ('A','J'));
          ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
 (9 rows)
 
--- Although SAOP doesn't fit partial indexes fully, we can use anded OR clause
+-- Although SAOP doesn't fit partial indexes fully, we can use added OR clause
 -- to scan another couple of partial indexes.
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
@@ -1188,6 +1188,17 @@ WHERE stringu1 IN ('B','J') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR 
unique1 = 1);
 (8 rows)
 
 RESET enable_indexscan;
+--Check the case when we construct ANY list with unique elements
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique1 = 1;
+                     QUERY PLAN                     
+----------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Index Only Scan using onek2_u1_prtl on onek2
+         Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
+(3 rows)
+
 RESET enable_seqscan;
 --
 -- Test some corner cases that have been known to confuse the planner
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql
index 223f55af4e..b8cee41658 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT unique2,stringu1 FROM onek2
 WHERE unique1 IN ((random()*2)::integer, (random()*3)::integer);
 
--- Combine different saops. Soe of them doesnt' fit a set of partial indexes,
+-- Combine different saops. Some of them doesnt' fit a set of partial indexes,
 -- but other fits.
 -- Unfortunately, we don't combine saop and OR clauses so far.
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
@@ -307,13 +307,18 @@ WHERE unique1 < 1 OR (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J');
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
 WHERE (unique1 < 1 OR stringu1 IN ('A','J'));
--- Although SAOP doesn't fit partial indexes fully, we can use anded OR clause
+-- Although SAOP doesn't fit partial indexes fully, we can use added OR clause
 -- to scan another couple of partial indexes.
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
 WHERE stringu1 IN ('B','J') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR unique1 = 1);
 
 RESET enable_indexscan;
+--Check the case when we construct ANY list with unique elements
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique1 = 1;
+
 RESET enable_seqscan;
 
 --
From 9721f3e8ecda972241d9bedbfb915fd1514cb9d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Andrey V. Lepikhov" <a.lepik...@postgrespro.ru>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 13:29:46 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Teach generate_bitmap_or_paths to build BitmapOr paths
 over SAOP clauses.

Likewise OR clauses, discover SAOP array and try to split its elements
between smaller sized arrays to fit a set of partial indexes.
---
 doc/src/sgml/config.sgml                  |   3 +
 src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c     | 315 ++++++++++++++++++----
 src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c     |  46 ++++
 src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c |  13 +
 src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h         |  16 ++
 src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h      |   1 +
 src/test/regress/expected/select.out      | 293 ++++++++++++++++++++
 src/test/regress/sql/select.sql           |  87 ++++++
 src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list          |   1 +
 9 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
index 1fdfffd79b..8008b05327 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
@@ -5446,6 +5446,9 @@ ANY <replaceable class="parameter">num_sync</replaceable> ( <replaceable class="
         The grouping technique of this transformation is based on the equivalence of variable sides.
         One side of such an expression must be a constant clause, and the other must contain a variable clause.
         The default is <literal>on</literal>.
+        Also, during BitmapScan paths generation it enables analysis of elements
+        of IN or ANY constant arrays to cover such clause with BitmapOr set of
+        partial index scans.
         </para>
       </listitem>
      </varlistentry>
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c
index 32c6a8bbdc..f92a47c3d5 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 #include "optimizer/paths.h"
 #include "optimizer/prep.h"
 #include "optimizer/restrictinfo.h"
+#include "utils/array.h"
 #include "utils/lsyscache.h"
 #include "utils/selfuncs.h"
 
@@ -1220,11 +1221,188 @@ build_paths_for_OR(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
 	return result;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Building index paths over SAOP clause differs from the logic of OR clauses.
+ * Here we iterate across all the array elements and split them to SAOPs,
+ * corresponding to different indexes. We must match each element to an index.
+ */
+static List *
+build_paths_for_SAOP(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, RestrictInfo *rinfo,
+					 List *other_clauses)
+{
+	List			   *result = NIL;
+	List			   *predicate_lists = NIL;
+	ListCell		   *lc;
+	PredicatesData	   *pd;
+	ScalarArrayOpExpr  *saop = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) rinfo->clause;
+
+	Assert(IsA(saop, ScalarArrayOpExpr) && saop->useOr);
+
+	if (!IsA(lsecond(saop->args), Const))
+		/*
+		 * Has it practical outcome to merge arrays which couldn't constantified
+		 * before that step?
+		 */
+		return NIL;
+
+	/* Collect predicates */
+	foreach(lc, rel->indexlist)
+	{
+		IndexOptInfo *index = (IndexOptInfo *) lfirst(lc);
+
+		/* Take into consideration partial indexes supporting bitmap scans */
+		if (!index->amhasgetbitmap || index->indpred == NIL || index->predOK)
+			continue;
+
+		pd = palloc0(sizeof(PredicatesData));
+		pd->id = foreach_current_index(lc);
+		/* The trick with reducing recursion is stolen from predicate_implied_by */
+		pd->predicate = list_length(index->indpred) == 1 ?
+										(Node *) linitial(index->indpred) :
+										(Node *) index->indpred;
+		predicate_lists = lappend(predicate_lists, (void *) pd);
+	}
+
+	/* Split the array data according to index predicates. */
+	if (predicate_lists == NIL ||
+		!saop_covered_by_predicates(saop, predicate_lists))
+		return NIL;
+
+	other_clauses = list_delete_ptr(other_clauses, rinfo);
+
+	/*
+	 * Having incoming SAOP split to set of smaller SAOPs which can be applied
+	 * to partial indexes, generate paths for each one.
+	 */
+	foreach(lc, predicate_lists)
+	{
+		IndexOptInfo	   *index;
+		IndexClauseSet		clauseset;
+		List			   *indexpaths;
+		RestrictInfo	   *rinfo1 = NULL;
+		Expr			   *clause;
+		ArrayType		   *arrayval = NULL;
+		ArrayExpr		   *arr = NULL;
+		Const			   *arrayconst;
+		ScalarArrayOpExpr  *dest;
+
+		pd = (PredicatesData *) lfirst(lc);
+		if (pd->elems == NIL)
+			/* The index doesn't participate in this operation */
+			continue;
+
+		/* Make up new array */
+		arrayconst = lsecond_node(Const, saop->args);
+		arrayval = DatumGetArrayTypeP(arrayconst->constvalue);
+		arr = makeNode(ArrayExpr);
+		arr->array_collid = arrayconst->constcollid;
+		arr->array_typeid = arrayconst->consttype;
+		arr->element_typeid = arrayval->elemtype;
+		arr->elements = pd->elems;
+		arr->location = -1;
+		arr->multidims = false;
+
+		/* Compose new SAOP, partially covering the source one */
+		dest = makeNode(ScalarArrayOpExpr);
+		memcpy(dest, saop, sizeof(ScalarArrayOpExpr));
+		dest->args = list_make2(linitial(saop->args), arr);
+		clause = (Expr *) estimate_expression_value(root, (Node *) dest);
+
+		/*
+		 * Create new RestrictInfo. It maybe more heavy than just copy node,
+		 * but remember some internals: the serial number, selectivity
+		 * cache etc.
+		 */
+		rinfo1 = make_restrictinfo(root, clause,
+								   rinfo->is_pushed_down,
+								   rinfo->has_clone,
+								   rinfo->is_clone,
+								   rinfo->pseudoconstant,
+								   rinfo->security_level,
+								   rinfo->required_relids,
+								   rinfo->incompatible_relids,
+								   rinfo->outer_relids);
+
+		index = list_nth(rel->indexlist, pd->id);
+		Assert(predicate_implied_by(index->indpred, list_make1(rinfo1), true));
+
+		/* Excluding partial indexes with predOK we make this statement false */
+		Assert(!predicate_implied_by(index->indpred, other_clauses, false));
+
+		/* Time to generate index paths */
+
+		MemSet(&clauseset, 0, sizeof(clauseset));
+		match_clauses_to_index(root, list_make1(rinfo1), index, &clauseset);
+		match_clauses_to_index(root, other_clauses, index, &clauseset);
+
+		/* Predicate has found already. So, it is ok for the empty match */
+
+		indexpaths = build_index_paths(root, rel,
+									   index, &clauseset,
+									   true,
+									   ST_BITMAPSCAN,
+									   NULL,
+									   NULL);
+		Assert(indexpaths != NIL);
+		result = lappend(result, indexpaths);
+	}
+	return result;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Analyse incoming SAOP node to cover it by partial indexes.
+ *
+ * The returning pathlist must be ANDed to the final BitmapScan path.
+ * The function returns NULL when an array element cannot be fitted with some
+ * partial index. The Rationale for such an operation is that when schema
+ * contains many partial indexes, the SAOP clause may be effectively fulfilled
+ * by appending results of scanning some minimal set of tiny partial indexes.
+ *
+ * Working jointly with the TransformOrExprToANY routine, it provides a user
+ * with some sort of independence of the query plan from the approach to writing
+ * alternatives for the same entity in the WHERE section.
+ */
+static List *
+generate_saop_pathlist(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
+					   RestrictInfo *rinfo, List *all_clauses)
+{
+	List	   *pathlist = NIL;
+	Path	   *bitmapqual;
+	List	   *indlist;
+	ListCell   *lc;
+
+	if (!enable_or_transformation)
+		return NIL;
+
+	/*
+	 * We must be able to match at least one index to each element of
+	 * the array, else we can't use it.
+	 */
+	indlist = build_paths_for_SAOP(root, rel, rinfo, all_clauses);
+	if (indlist == NIL)
+		return NIL;
+
+	/*
+	 * OK, pick the most promising AND combination, and add it to
+	 * pathlist.
+	 */
+	foreach (lc, indlist)
+	{
+		List *plist = lfirst_node(List, lc);
+
+		bitmapqual = choose_bitmap_and(root, rel, plist);
+		pathlist = lappend(pathlist, bitmapqual);
+	}
+
+	return pathlist;
+}
+
 /*
  * generate_bitmap_or_paths
- *		Look through the list of clauses to find OR clauses, and generate
- *		a BitmapOrPath for each one we can handle that way.  Return a list
- *		of the generated BitmapOrPaths.
+ *		Look through the list of clauses to find OR and SAOP clauses, and
+ *		Each saop clause are splitted to be covered by partial indexes.
+ *		generate a BitmapOrPath for each one we can handle that way.
+ *		Return a list of the generated BitmapOrPaths.
  *
  * other_clauses is a list of additional clauses that can be assumed true
  * for the purpose of generating indexquals, but are not to be searched for
@@ -1247,68 +1425,99 @@ generate_bitmap_or_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
 	foreach(lc, clauses)
 	{
 		RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, lc);
-		List	   *pathlist;
+		List	   *pathlist = NIL;
 		Path	   *bitmapqual;
 		ListCell   *j;
 
-		/* Ignore RestrictInfos that aren't ORs */
-		if (!restriction_is_or_clause(rinfo))
+		if (restriction_is_saop_clause(rinfo))
+		{
+			pathlist = generate_saop_pathlist(root, rel, rinfo,
+											  all_clauses);
+		}
+		else if (!restriction_is_or_clause(rinfo))
+			/* Ignore RestrictInfos that aren't ORs */
 			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * We must be able to match at least one index to each of the arms of
-		 * the OR, else we can't use it.
-		 */
-		pathlist = NIL;
-		foreach(j, ((BoolExpr *) rinfo->orclause)->args)
+		else
 		{
-			Node	   *orarg = (Node *) lfirst(j);
-			List	   *indlist;
-
-			/* OR arguments should be ANDs or sub-RestrictInfos */
-			if (is_andclause(orarg))
+			/*
+			 * We must be able to match at least one index to each of the arms of
+			 * the OR, else we can't use it.
+			 */
+			foreach(j, ((BoolExpr *) rinfo->orclause)->args)
 			{
-				List	   *andargs = ((BoolExpr *) orarg)->args;
+				Node	   *orarg = (Node *) lfirst(j);
+				List	   *indlist;
 
-				indlist = build_paths_for_OR(root, rel,
-											 andargs,
-											 all_clauses);
+				/* OR arguments should be ANDs or sub-RestrictInfos */
+				if (is_andclause(orarg))
+				{
+					List	   *andargs = ((BoolExpr *) orarg)->args;
 
-				/* Recurse in case there are sub-ORs */
-				indlist = list_concat(indlist,
-									  generate_bitmap_or_paths(root, rel,
-															   andargs,
-															   all_clauses));
-			}
-			else
-			{
-				RestrictInfo *ri = castNode(RestrictInfo, orarg);
-				List	   *orargs;
+					indlist = build_paths_for_OR(root, rel,
+												 andargs,
+												 all_clauses);
 
-				Assert(!restriction_is_or_clause(ri));
-				orargs = list_make1(ri);
+					/* Recurse in case there are sub-ORs */
+					indlist = list_concat(indlist,
+										  generate_bitmap_or_paths(root, rel,
+																   andargs,
+																   all_clauses));
+				}
+				else
+				{
+					RestrictInfo *ri = castNode(RestrictInfo, orarg);
+					List	   *orargs;
 
-				indlist = build_paths_for_OR(root, rel,
-											 orargs,
-											 all_clauses);
-			}
+					Assert(!restriction_is_or_clause(ri));
 
-			/*
-			 * If nothing matched this arm, we can't do anything with this OR
-			 * clause.
-			 */
-			if (indlist == NIL)
-			{
-				pathlist = NIL;
-				break;
-			}
+					orargs = list_make1(ri);
 
-			/*
-			 * OK, pick the most promising AND combination, and add it to
-			 * pathlist.
-			 */
-			bitmapqual = choose_bitmap_and(root, rel, indlist);
-			pathlist = lappend(pathlist, bitmapqual);
+					if (restriction_is_saop_clause(ri))
+					{
+						List *paths;
+
+						paths = generate_saop_pathlist(root, rel, ri,
+														 all_clauses);
+
+						if (paths != NIL)
+						{
+							/*
+							 * Add paths to pathlist and immediately jump to the
+							 * next element of the OR clause.
+							 */
+							pathlist = list_concat(pathlist, paths);
+							continue;
+						}
+
+						/*
+						 * Pass down out of this if construction:
+						 * If saop isn't covered by partial indexes, try to
+						 * build scan path for the saop as a whole.
+						 */
+					}
+
+					indlist = build_paths_for_OR(root, rel,
+												 orargs,
+												 all_clauses);
+				}
+
+				/*
+				 * If nothing matched this arm, we can't do anything with this OR
+				 * clause.
+				 */
+				if (indlist == NIL)
+				{
+					pathlist = NIL;
+					break;
+				}
+
+				/*
+				 * OK, pick the most promising AND combination, and add it to
+				 * pathlist.
+				 */
+				bitmapqual = choose_bitmap_and(root, rel, indlist);
+				pathlist = lappend(pathlist, bitmapqual);
+			}
 		}
 
 		/*
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c
index b76896dfbf..a3a6d0024b 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c
@@ -103,6 +103,52 @@ static Oid	get_btree_test_op(Oid pred_op, Oid clause_op, bool refute_it);
 static void InvalidateOprProofCacheCallBack(Datum arg, int cacheid, uint32 hashvalue);
 
 
+/*
+ * Could this ANY () expression can be split into a set of ANYs over partial
+ * indexes? If yes, return these saops in the PredicatesData structure.
+ */
+bool
+saop_covered_by_predicates(ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop, List *predicate_lists)
+{
+	ListCell		   *lc;
+	PredIterInfoData	clause_info;
+	bool				result = false;
+
+	if (predicate_classify((Node *) saop, &clause_info) != CLASS_OR)
+		return false;
+
+	iterate_begin(pitem, (Node *) saop, clause_info)
+	{
+		result = false;
+
+		foreach(lc, predicate_lists)
+		{
+			PredicatesData *pd = (PredicatesData *) lfirst(lc);
+
+			if (!predicate_implied_by_recurse(pitem, pd->predicate, false))
+				continue;
+
+			/* Predicate is found. Add the elem to the saop clause */
+			Assert(IsA(pitem, OpExpr));
+
+			/* Extract constant from the expression */
+			pd->elems = lappend(pd->elems,
+					copyObject(lsecond_node(Const, ((OpExpr *) pitem)->args)));
+			result = true;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if (!result)
+			/*
+			 * The element doesn't fit any index. Interrupt the process immediately
+			 */
+			break;
+	}
+	iterate_end(clause_info);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
 /*
  * predicate_implied_by
  *	  Recursively checks whether the clauses in clause_list imply that the
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
index 0b406e9334..1dad1dc654 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
@@ -421,6 +421,19 @@ restriction_is_or_clause(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo)
 		return false;
 }
 
+bool
+restriction_is_saop_clause(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo)
+{
+	if (restrictinfo->clause && IsA(restrictinfo->clause, ScalarArrayOpExpr))
+	{
+		ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) restrictinfo->clause;
+
+		if (saop->useOr)
+			return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * restriction_is_securely_promotable
  *
diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h b/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h
index 0ee7154e08..4029cf07be 100644
--- a/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h
+++ b/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h
@@ -160,6 +160,20 @@ extern List *expand_function_arguments(List *args, bool include_out_arguments,
 
 /* in util/predtest.c: */
 
+/*
+ * Contains information needed to extract from saop a set of elements which can
+ * be covered by the partial index:
+ * id - caller's identification of the index.
+ * predicate - predicate expression of the index
+ * elems - returning list of array elements which corresponds to this predicate
+ */
+typedef struct PredicatesData
+{
+	int		id;
+	Node   *predicate;
+	List   *elems;
+} PredicatesData;
+
 /*
  * Proof attempts involving large arrays in ScalarArrayOpExpr nodes are
  * likely to require O(N^2) time, and more often than not fail anyway.
@@ -169,6 +183,8 @@ extern List *expand_function_arguments(List *args, bool include_out_arguments,
  */
 #define MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE		100
 
+extern bool saop_covered_by_predicates(ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop,
+									  List *predicate_lists);
 extern bool predicate_implied_by(List *predicate_list, List *clause_list,
 								 bool weak);
 extern bool predicate_refuted_by(List *predicate_list, List *clause_list,
diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h b/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h
index 1b42c832c5..2cd5fbf943 100644
--- a/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h
+++ b/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ extern RestrictInfo *make_restrictinfo(PlannerInfo *root,
 									   Relids outer_relids);
 extern RestrictInfo *commute_restrictinfo(RestrictInfo *rinfo, Oid comm_op);
 extern bool restriction_is_or_clause(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo);
+extern bool restriction_is_saop_clause(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo);
 extern bool restriction_is_securely_promotable(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo,
 											   RelOptInfo *rel);
 extern List *get_actual_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list);
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/select.out b/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
index 33a6dceb0e..f4f5493c43 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/select.out
@@ -907,6 +907,299 @@ select unique1, unique2 from onek2
        0 |     998
 (2 rows)
 
+SET enable_seqscan TO off;
+SET enable_indexscan TO off; -- Only BitmapScan is a subject matter here
+SET enable_or_transformation = 'off';
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J';
+                                QUERY PLAN                                
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+         Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 < 'B'::name) OR (stringu1 = 'J'::name))
+         Filter: ((stringu1 = 'A'::name) OR (stringu1 = 'J'::name))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+                     Index Cond: (stringu1 = 'J'::name)
+(8 rows)
+
+-- Without the transformation only seqscan possible here
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique2 < 1 AND stringu1 IN ('A','J') AND stringu1 < 'Z';
+                                         QUERY PLAN                                          
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on onek2
+   Filter: ((unique2 < 1) AND (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[])) AND (stringu1 < 'Z'::name))
+(2 rows)
+
+-- Use partial indexes
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE stringu1 IN ('B','J') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR unique1 = 1);
+                                             QUERY PLAN                                             
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+         Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 < 'B'::name) OR (unique1 = 1))
+         Filter: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{B,J}'::name[])) AND ((stringu1 = 'A'::name) OR (unique1 = 1)))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+                     Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
+(8 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 < 1 OR (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J');
+                                     QUERY PLAN                                      
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: ((unique1 < 1) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name) OR (stringu1 = 'J'::name))
+   Filter: ((unique1 < 1) OR (stringu1 = 'A'::name) OR (stringu1 = 'J'::name))
+   ->  BitmapOr
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (unique1 < 1)
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (stringu1 = 'J'::name)
+(9 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique2 = PI()::integer;
+                 QUERY PLAN                 
+--------------------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on onek2
+   Filter: ((unique1 = 1) OR (unique2 = 3))
+(2 rows)
+
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
+-- OR <-> ANY transformation must find a path with partial indexes scan
+-- regardless the clause representation.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J';
+                                     QUERY PLAN                                     
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+         Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name))
+         Filter: (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[]))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+                     Index Cond: (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[]))
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+(8 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A','J');
+                                     QUERY PLAN                                     
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+         Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name))
+         Filter: (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[]))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+                     Index Cond: (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[]))
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+(8 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}');
+                                     QUERY PLAN                                     
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+         Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name))
+         Filter: (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[]))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+                     Index Cond: (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[]))
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+(8 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A') OR stringu1 IN ('J');
+                                     QUERY PLAN                                     
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+         Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name))
+         Filter: (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[]))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+                     Index Cond: (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[]))
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+(8 rows)
+
+-- Don't scan partial indexes because of extra value.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A', 'J', 'C');
+                      QUERY PLAN                      
+------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Seq Scan on onek2
+         Filter: (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J,C}'::name[]))
+(3 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2 FROM onek2
+WHERE stringu1 IN ('A', 'A') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'A');
+                                QUERY PLAN                                 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: (stringu1 < 'B'::name)
+   Filter: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{A,A}'::name[])) AND (stringu1 = 'A'::name))
+   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+(4 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique2 < 1 AND stringu1 IN ('A','J') AND stringu1 < 'Z';
+                                                          QUERY PLAN                                                           
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: (((stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) AND (stringu1 < 'Z'::name)) OR ((unique2 < 1) AND (stringu1 < 'B'::name)))
+   Filter: ((unique2 < 1) AND (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[])))
+   ->  BitmapOr
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+               Index Cond: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) AND (stringu1 < 'Z'::name))
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+               Index Cond: (unique2 < 1)
+(8 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique1 = PI()::integer;
+                    QUERY PLAN                    
+--------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: ((unique1 = 1) OR (unique1 = 3))
+   ->  BitmapOr
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (unique1 = 3)
+(7 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 IN (1, PI()::integer); -- TODO: why it is differs from previous example?
+                        QUERY PLAN                        
+----------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: (unique1 = ANY ('{1,3}'::integer[]))
+   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+         Index Cond: (unique1 = ANY ('{1,3}'::integer[]))
+(4 rows)
+
+-- Don't apply the optimization to clauses, containing volatile functions
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2,stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = (random()*2)::integer OR unique1 = (random()*3)::integer;
+                                                             QUERY PLAN                                                             
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on onek2
+   Filter: ((unique1 = ((random() * '2'::double precision))::integer) OR (unique1 = ((random() * '3'::double precision))::integer))
+(2 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2,stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 IN ((random()*2)::integer, (random()*3)::integer);
+                                                           QUERY PLAN                                                            
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on onek2
+   Filter: (unique1 = ANY (ARRAY[((random() * '2'::double precision))::integer, ((random() * '3'::double precision))::integer]))
+(2 rows)
+
+-- Combine different saops. Some of them doesnt' fit a set of partial indexes,
+-- but other fits.
+-- Unfortunately, we don't combine saop and OR clauses so far.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2,stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE
+  unique1 IN (1,2,21) AND
+  (stringu1 IN ('A','J') OR unique1 IN (3,4) OR stringu1 = 'J');
+                                                                                          QUERY PLAN                                                                                          
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name) OR ((unique1 = ANY ('{3,4}'::integer[])) AND (unique1 = ANY ('{1,2,21}'::integer[]))) OR (stringu1 = 'J'::name))
+   Filter: ((unique1 = ANY ('{1,2,21}'::integer[])) AND ((stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[])) OR (unique1 = ANY ('{3,4}'::integer[])) OR (stringu1 = 'J'::name)))
+   ->  BitmapOr
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[]))
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+               Index Cond: ((unique1 = ANY ('{3,4}'::integer[])) AND (unique1 = ANY ('{1,2,21}'::integer[])))
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (stringu1 = 'J'::name)
+(11 rows)
+
+-- Check recursive combination of OR and SAOP expressions
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 < 1 OR (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J');
+                                          QUERY PLAN                                           
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: ((unique1 < 1) OR (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name))
+   Filter: ((unique1 < 1) OR (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[])))
+   ->  BitmapOr
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (unique1 < 1)
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[]))
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+(9 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE (unique1 < 1 OR stringu1 IN ('A','J'));
+                                          QUERY PLAN                                           
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+   Recheck Cond: ((unique1 < 1) OR (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[])) OR (stringu1 < 'B'::name))
+   Filter: ((unique1 < 1) OR (stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}'::name[])))
+   ->  BitmapOr
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (unique1 < 1)
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_stu1_prtl
+               Index Cond: (stringu1 = ANY ('{J}'::name[]))
+         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+(9 rows)
+
+-- Although SAOP doesn't fit partial indexes fully, we can use added OR clause
+-- to scan another couple of partial indexes.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE stringu1 IN ('B','J') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR unique1 = 1);
+                                             QUERY PLAN                                             
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on onek2
+         Recheck Cond: ((stringu1 < 'B'::name) OR (unique1 = 1))
+         Filter: ((stringu1 = ANY ('{B,J}'::name[])) AND ((stringu1 = 'A'::name) OR (unique1 = 1)))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u2_prtl
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on onek2_u1_prtl
+                     Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
+(8 rows)
+
+RESET enable_indexscan;
+--Check the case when we construct ANY list with unique elements
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique1 = 1;
+                     QUERY PLAN                     
+----------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Index Only Scan using onek2_u1_prtl on onek2
+         Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
+(3 rows)
+
+RESET enable_seqscan;
 --
 -- Test some corner cases that have been known to confuse the planner
 --
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql
index 019f1e7673..b8cee41658 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/select.sql
@@ -234,6 +234,93 @@ select unique1, unique2 from onek2
 select unique1, unique2 from onek2
   where (unique2 = 11 and stringu1 < 'B') or unique1 = 0;
 
+SET enable_seqscan TO off;
+SET enable_indexscan TO off; -- Only BitmapScan is a subject matter here
+SET enable_or_transformation = 'off';
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J';
+-- Without the transformation only seqscan possible here
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique2 < 1 AND stringu1 IN ('A','J') AND stringu1 < 'Z';
+-- Use partial indexes
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE stringu1 IN ('B','J') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR unique1 = 1);
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 < 1 OR (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J');
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique2 = PI()::integer;
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
+
+-- OR <-> ANY transformation must find a path with partial indexes scan
+-- regardless the clause representation.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J';
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A','J');
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 = ANY ('{A,J}');
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A') OR stringu1 IN ('J');
+
+-- Don't scan partial indexes because of extra value.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2 WHERE stringu1 IN ('A', 'J', 'C');
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2 FROM onek2
+WHERE stringu1 IN ('A', 'A') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'A');
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique2 < 1 AND stringu1 IN ('A','J') AND stringu1 < 'Z';
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique1 = PI()::integer;
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 IN (1, PI()::integer); -- TODO: why it is differs from previous example?
+
+-- Don't apply the optimization to clauses, containing volatile functions
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2,stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = (random()*2)::integer OR unique1 = (random()*3)::integer;
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2,stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 IN ((random()*2)::integer, (random()*3)::integer);
+
+-- Combine different saops. Some of them doesnt' fit a set of partial indexes,
+-- but other fits.
+-- Unfortunately, we don't combine saop and OR clauses so far.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2,stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE
+  unique1 IN (1,2,21) AND
+  (stringu1 IN ('A','J') OR unique1 IN (3,4) OR stringu1 = 'J');
+
+-- Check recursive combination of OR and SAOP expressions
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 < 1 OR (stringu1 = 'A' OR stringu1 = 'J');
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT unique2, stringu1 FROM onek2
+WHERE (unique1 < 1 OR stringu1 IN ('A','J'));
+-- Although SAOP doesn't fit partial indexes fully, we can use added OR clause
+-- to scan another couple of partial indexes.
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE stringu1 IN ('B','J') AND (stringu1 = 'A' OR unique1 = 1);
+
+RESET enable_indexscan;
+--Check the case when we construct ANY list with unique elements
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM onek2
+WHERE unique1 = 1 OR unique1 = 1;
+
+RESET enable_seqscan;
+
 --
 -- Test some corner cases that have been known to confuse the planner
 --
diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
index f4b6fee893..7930a17e81 100644
--- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
+++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
@@ -2141,6 +2141,7 @@ PredIterInfoData
 PredXactList
 PredicateLockData
 PredicateLockTargetType
+PredicatesData
 PrefetchBufferResult
 PrepParallelRestorePtrType
 PrepareStmt
-- 
2.34.1

From af4592111fcd1f5fb85216c7d56f19ed0ffde38a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alena Rybakina <a.rybak...@postgrespro.ru>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 22:01:09 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Transform OR clauses to ANY expression.

Replace (expr op C1) OR (expr op C2) ... with expr op ANY(ARRAY[C1, C2, ...]) on the
preliminary stage of optimization when we are still working with the
expression tree.
Here C<X> is a constant expression, 'expr' is non-constant expression, 'op' is
an operator which returns boolean result and has a commuter (for the case of
reverse order of constant and non-constant parts of the expression,
like 'CX op expr').
Sometimes it can lead to not optimal plan. But we think it is better to have
array of elements instead of a lot of OR clauses. Here is a room for further
optimizations on decomposing that array into more optimal parts.
Authors: Alena Rybakina <lena.riback...@yandex.ru>, Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepik...@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie>, Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universal...@gmail.com>
---
 .../postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out    |   8 +-
 doc/src/sgml/config.sgml                      |  17 +
 src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c          |  27 ++
 src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c         |   9 -
 src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c               | 356 ++++++++++++++++++
 src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c           |  11 +
 src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample |   1 +
 src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl              |   6 +-
 src/include/nodes/queryjumble.h               |   1 +
 src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h             |  10 +
 src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out    | 156 +++++++-
 src/test/regress/expected/join.out            |  62 ++-
 src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out | 215 ++++++++++-
 src/test/regress/expected/stats_ext.out       |  12 +-
 src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out        |   3 +-
 src/test/regress/expected/tidscan.out         |  23 +-
 src/test/regress/sql/create_index.sql         |  35 ++
 src/test/regress/sql/join.sql                 |  10 +
 src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql      |  22 ++
 src/test/regress/sql/tidscan.sql              |   6 +
 src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list              |   2 +
 21 files changed, 923 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
index c355e8f3f7..48685bf6ff 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
@@ -8797,18 +8797,18 @@ insert into utrtest values (2, 'qux');
 -- Check case where the foreign partition is a subplan target rel
 explain (verbose, costs off)
 update utrtest set a = 1 where a = 1 or a = 2 returning *;
-                                             QUERY PLAN                                             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+                                                  QUERY PLAN                                                  
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Update on public.utrtest
    Output: utrtest_1.a, utrtest_1.b
    Foreign Update on public.remp utrtest_1
    Update on public.locp utrtest_2
    ->  Append
          ->  Foreign Update on public.remp utrtest_1
-               Remote SQL: UPDATE public.loct SET a = 1 WHERE (((a = 1) OR (a = 2))) RETURNING a, b
+               Remote SQL: UPDATE public.loct SET a = 1 WHERE ((a = ANY ('{1,2}'::integer[]))) RETURNING a, b
          ->  Seq Scan on public.locp utrtest_2
                Output: 1, utrtest_2.tableoid, utrtest_2.ctid, NULL::record
-               Filter: ((utrtest_2.a = 1) OR (utrtest_2.a = 2))
+               Filter: (utrtest_2.a = ANY ('{1,2}'::integer[]))
 (10 rows)
 
 -- The new values are concatenated with ' triggered !'
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
index b38cbd714a..1fdfffd79b 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
@@ -5433,6 +5433,23 @@ ANY <replaceable class="parameter">num_sync</replaceable> ( <replaceable class="
       </listitem>
      </varlistentry>
 
+     <varlistentry id="guc-enable-or-transformation" xreflabel="enable_or_transformation">
+      <term><varname>enable_or_transformation</varname> (<type>boolean</type>)
+       <indexterm>
+        <primary><varname>enable_or_transformation</varname> configuration parameter</primary>
+       </indexterm>
+      </term>
+      <listitem>
+       <para>
+        Enables or disables the query planner's ability to lookup and group multiple
+        similar OR expressions to ANY (<xref linkend="functions-comparisons-any-some"/>) expressions.
+        The grouping technique of this transformation is based on the equivalence of variable sides.
+        One side of such an expression must be a constant clause, and the other must contain a variable clause.
+        The default is <literal>on</literal>.
+        </para>
+      </listitem>
+     </varlistentry>
+
      <varlistentry id="guc-enable-parallel-append" xreflabel="enable_parallel_append">
       <term><varname>enable_parallel_append</varname> (<type>boolean</type>)
       <indexterm>
diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c
index 2c116c8728..0c5b4a011b 100644
--- a/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/nodes/queryjumblefuncs.c
@@ -141,6 +141,33 @@ JumbleQuery(Query *query)
 	return jstate;
 }
 
+JumbleState *
+JumbleExpr(Expr *expr, uint64 *queryId)
+{
+	JumbleState *jstate = NULL;
+
+	Assert(queryId != NULL);
+
+	jstate = (JumbleState *) palloc(sizeof(JumbleState));
+
+	/* Set up workspace for query jumbling */
+	jstate->jumble = (unsigned char *) palloc(JUMBLE_SIZE);
+	jstate->jumble_len = 0;
+	jstate->clocations_buf_size = 32;
+	jstate->clocations = (LocationLen *)
+		palloc(jstate->clocations_buf_size * sizeof(LocationLen));
+	jstate->clocations_count = 0;
+	jstate->highest_extern_param_id = 0;
+
+	/* Compute query ID */
+	_jumbleNode(jstate, (Node *) expr);
+	*queryId = DatumGetUInt64(hash_any_extended(jstate->jumble,
+												jstate->jumble_len,
+												0));
+
+	return jstate;
+}
+
 /*
  * Enables query identifier computation.
  *
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c
index c37b416e24..b76896dfbf 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c
@@ -30,15 +30,6 @@
 #include "utils/syscache.h"
 
 
-/*
- * Proof attempts involving large arrays in ScalarArrayOpExpr nodes are
- * likely to require O(N^2) time, and more often than not fail anyway.
- * So we set an arbitrary limit on the number of array elements that
- * we will allow to be treated as an AND or OR clause.
- * XXX is it worth exposing this as a GUC knob?
- */
-#define MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE		100
-
 /*
  * To avoid redundant coding in predicate_implied_by_recurse and
  * predicate_refuted_by_recurse, we need to abstract out the notion of
diff --git a/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c b/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c
index 9300c7b9ab..e9813ef6ab 100644
--- a/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c
+++ b/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c
@@ -16,12 +16,15 @@
 #include "postgres.h"
 
 #include "catalog/pg_aggregate.h"
+#include "catalog/pg_operator.h"
 #include "catalog/pg_proc.h"
 #include "catalog/pg_type.h"
 #include "commands/dbcommands.h"
+#include "common/hashfn.h"
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "nodes/makefuncs.h"
 #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h"
+#include "nodes/queryjumble.h"
 #include "optimizer/optimizer.h"
 #include "parser/analyze.h"
 #include "parser/parse_agg.h"
@@ -38,11 +41,13 @@
 #include "utils/date.h"
 #include "utils/fmgroids.h"
 #include "utils/lsyscache.h"
+#include "utils/syscache.h"
 #include "utils/timestamp.h"
 #include "utils/xml.h"
 
 /* GUC parameters */
 bool		Transform_null_equals = false;
+bool		enable_or_transformation = true;
 
 
 static Node *transformExprRecurse(ParseState *pstate, Node *expr);
@@ -99,6 +104,352 @@ static Expr *make_distinct_op(ParseState *pstate, List *opname,
 static Node *make_nulltest_from_distinct(ParseState *pstate,
 										 A_Expr *distincta, Node *arg);
 
+typedef struct OrClauseGroupKey
+{
+	NodeTag	type;
+
+	Expr   *expr; /* Pointer to the expression tree which has been a source for
+					the hashkey value */
+	Oid		opno;
+	Oid		exprtype;
+} OrClauseGroupKey;
+
+typedef struct OrClauseGroupEntry
+{
+	OrClauseGroupKey key;
+
+	List		   *consts;
+	List 		   *exprs;
+} OrClauseGroupEntry;
+
+/*
+ * Hash function to find candidate clauses.
+ */
+static uint32
+orclause_hash(const void *data, Size keysize)
+{
+	OrClauseGroupKey   *key = (OrClauseGroupKey *) data;
+	uint64				exprHash;
+
+	Assert(keysize == sizeof(OrClauseGroupKey));
+	Assert(IsA(data, Invalid));
+
+	(void) JumbleExpr(key->expr, &exprHash);
+
+	return hash_combine((uint32) exprHash,
+						hash_combine((uint32) key->opno,
+									 (uint32) key->exprtype));
+}
+
+static void *
+orclause_keycopy(void *dest, const void *src, Size keysize)
+{
+	OrClauseGroupKey *src_key = (OrClauseGroupKey *) src;
+	OrClauseGroupKey *dst_key = (OrClauseGroupKey *) dest;
+
+	Assert(sizeof(OrClauseGroupKey) == keysize);
+	Assert(IsA(src, Invalid));
+
+	dst_key->type = T_Invalid;
+	dst_key->expr = src_key->expr;
+	dst_key->opno = src_key->opno;
+	dst_key->exprtype = src_key->exprtype;
+	return dst_key;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Dynahash match function to use in or_group_htab
+ */
+static int
+orclause_match(const void *data1, const void *data2, Size keysize)
+{
+	OrClauseGroupKey   *key1 = (OrClauseGroupKey *) data1;
+	OrClauseGroupKey   *key2 = (OrClauseGroupKey *) data2;
+
+	Assert(sizeof(OrClauseGroupKey) == keysize);
+	Assert(IsA(key1, Invalid));
+	Assert(IsA(key2, Invalid));
+
+	if (key1->opno == key2->opno &&
+		key1->exprtype == key2->exprtype &&
+		equal(key1->expr, key2->expr))
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * TransformOrExprToANY -
+ *	  Discover the args of an OR expression and try to group similar OR
+ *	  expressions to an ANY operation.
+ *	  Transformation must be already done on input args list before the call.
+ *	  Transformation groups two-sided equality operations. One side of such an
+ *	  operation must be plain constant or constant expression. The other side of
+ *	  the clause must be a variable expression without volatile functions.
+ *	  The grouping technique is based on an equivalence of variable sides of the
+ *	  expression: using queryId and equal() routine, it groups constant sides of
+ *	  similar clauses into an array. After the grouping procedure, each couple
+ *	  ('variable expression' and 'constant array') form a new SAOP operation,
+ *	  which is added to the args list of the returning expression.
+ *
+ *	  NOTE: function returns OR BoolExpr if more than one clause are detected in
+ *	  the final args list, or ScalarArrayOpExpr if all args were grouped into
+ *	  the single SAOP expression.
+ */
+static Node *
+TransformOrExprToANY(ParseState *pstate, List *args, int location)
+{
+	List				   *or_list = NIL;
+	List				   *entries = NIL;
+	ListCell			   *lc;
+	HASHCTL					info;
+	HTAB 				   *or_group_htab = NULL;
+	int 					len_ors = list_length(args);
+	OrClauseGroupEntry	   *entry = NULL;
+
+	Assert(enable_or_transformation && len_ors > 1);
+
+	MemSet(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+	info.keysize = sizeof(OrClauseGroupKey);
+	info.entrysize = sizeof(OrClauseGroupEntry);
+	info.hash = orclause_hash;
+	info.keycopy = orclause_keycopy;
+	info.match = orclause_match;
+	or_group_htab = hash_create("OR Groups",
+								len_ors,
+								&info,
+								HASH_ELEM | HASH_FUNCTION | HASH_COMPARE | HASH_KEYCOPY);
+
+	foreach(lc, args)
+	{
+		Node				   *orqual = lfirst(lc);
+		Node				   *const_expr;
+		Node				   *nconst_expr;
+		OrClauseGroupKey		hashkey;
+		bool					found;
+		Oid						opno;
+		Oid						exprtype;
+		Node				   *leftop, *rightop;
+
+		if (!IsA(orqual, OpExpr))
+		{
+			entries = lappend(entries, orqual);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		opno = ((OpExpr *) orqual)->opno;
+		if (get_op_rettype(opno) != BOOLOID)
+		{
+			/* Only operator returning boolean suits OR -> ANY transformation */
+			entries = lappend(entries, orqual);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Detect the constant side of the clause. Recall non-constant
+		 * expression can be made not only with Vars, but also with Params,
+		 * which is not bonded with any relation. Thus, we detect the const
+		 * side - if another side is constant too, the orqual couldn't be
+		 * an OpExpr.
+		 * Get pointers to constant and expression sides of the qual.
+		 */
+		leftop = get_leftop(orqual);
+		if (IsA(leftop, RelabelType))
+			leftop = (Node *) ((RelabelType *) leftop)->arg;
+		rightop = get_rightop(orqual);
+		if (IsA(rightop, RelabelType))
+			rightop = (Node *) ((RelabelType *) rightop)->arg;
+
+		if (IsA(leftop, Const))
+		{
+			opno = get_commutator(opno);
+
+			if (!OidIsValid(opno))
+			{
+				/* commutator doesn't exist, we can't reverse the order */
+				entries = lappend(entries, orqual);
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			nconst_expr = get_rightop(orqual);
+			const_expr = get_leftop(orqual);
+		}
+		else if (IsA(rightop, Const))
+		{
+			const_expr = get_rightop(orqual);
+			nconst_expr = get_leftop(orqual);
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			entries = lappend(entries, orqual);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Transformation only works with both side type is not
+		 * { array | composite | domain | record }.
+		 * Also, forbid it for volatile expressions.
+		 */
+		exprtype = exprType(nconst_expr);
+		if (type_is_rowtype(exprType(const_expr)) ||
+			type_is_rowtype(exprtype) ||
+			contain_volatile_functions((Node *) nconst_expr))
+		{
+			entries = lappend(entries, orqual);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		* At this point we definitely have a transformable clause.
+		* Classify it and add into specific group of clauses, or create new
+		* group.
+		*/
+		hashkey.type = T_Invalid;
+		hashkey.expr = (Expr *) nconst_expr;
+		hashkey.opno = opno;
+		hashkey.exprtype = exprtype;
+		entry = hash_search(or_group_htab, &hashkey, HASH_ENTER, &found);
+
+		if (unlikely(found))
+		{
+			entry->consts = list_append_unique(entry->consts, const_expr);
+			entry->exprs = list_append_unique(entry->exprs, orqual);
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			entry->consts = list_make1(const_expr);
+			entry->exprs = list_make1(orqual);
+
+			/*
+			 * Add the entry to the list. It is needed exclusively to manage the
+			 * problem with the order of transformed clauses in explain.
+			 * Hash value can depend on the platform and version. Hence,
+			 * sequental scan of the hash table would prone to change the order
+			 * of clauses in lists and, as a result, break regression tests
+			 * accidentially.
+			 */
+			entries = lappend(entries, entry);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* Let's convert each group of clauses to an IN operation. */
+
+	/*
+	 * Go through the list of groups and convert each, where number of
+	 * consts more than 1. trivial groups move to OR-list again
+	 */
+	foreach (lc, entries)
+	{
+		Oid				    scalar_type;
+		Oid					array_type;
+
+		if (!IsA(lfirst(lc), Invalid))
+		{
+			or_list = lappend(or_list, lfirst(lc));
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		entry = (OrClauseGroupEntry *) lfirst(lc);
+
+		Assert(list_length(entry->consts) > 0);
+
+		if (list_length(entry->consts) == 1 ||
+			list_length(entry->consts) > MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE)
+		{
+			/*
+			 * Only one element or more than MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE elements in
+			 * the class Return origin expression into.
+			 * the BoolExpr args list unchanged.
+			 */
+			list_free(entry->consts);
+			or_list = list_concat(or_list, entry->exprs);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Do the transformation.
+		 */
+
+		scalar_type = entry->key.exprtype;
+		array_type = OidIsValid(scalar_type) ? get_array_type(scalar_type) :
+											   InvalidOid;
+
+		if (OidIsValid(array_type))
+		{
+			/*
+			 * OK: coerce all the right-hand non-Var inputs to the common
+			 * type and build an ArrayExpr for them.
+			 */
+			List			   *aexprs = NIL;
+			ArrayExpr		   *newa = NULL;
+			ScalarArrayOpExpr  *saopexpr = NULL;
+			HeapTuple			opertup;
+			Form_pg_operator	operform;
+			List			   *namelist = NIL;
+			ListCell		   *lc1;
+
+			foreach(lc1, entry->consts)
+			{
+				Node   *rexpr = (Node *) lfirst(lc1);
+
+				rexpr = coerce_to_common_type(pstate, rexpr,
+											  scalar_type,
+											  "IN");
+				aexprs = lappend(aexprs, rexpr);
+			}
+
+			newa = makeNode(ArrayExpr);
+			/* array_collid will be set by parse_collate.c */
+			newa->element_typeid = scalar_type;
+			newa->array_typeid = array_type;
+			newa->multidims = false;
+			newa->elements = aexprs;
+			newa->location = -1;
+
+			opertup = SearchSysCache1(OPEROID,
+									  ObjectIdGetDatum(entry->key.opno));
+			if (!HeapTupleIsValid(opertup))
+				elog(ERROR, "cache lookup failed for operator %u",
+					 entry->key.opno);
+
+			operform = (Form_pg_operator) GETSTRUCT(opertup);
+			if (!OperatorIsVisible(entry->key.opno))
+				namelist = lappend(namelist, makeString(get_namespace_name(operform->oprnamespace)));
+
+			namelist = lappend(namelist, makeString(pstrdup(NameStr(operform->oprname))));
+			ReleaseSysCache(opertup);
+
+			saopexpr =
+				(ScalarArrayOpExpr *)
+					make_scalar_array_op(pstate,
+										 namelist,
+										 true,
+										 (Node *) entry->key.expr,
+										 (Node *) newa,
+										 -1);
+
+			or_list = lappend(or_list, (void *) saopexpr);
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			/*
+			 * If the const node (right side of operator expression) 's type
+			 *  don't have “true” array type, then we cannnot do the transformation.
+			 * We simply concatenate the expression node.
+			 *
+			 */
+			list_free(entry->consts);
+			or_list = list_concat(or_list, entry->exprs);
+		}
+	}
+	hash_destroy(or_group_htab);
+	list_free(entries);
+
+	/* One more trick: assemble correct clause */
+	return (Node *) ((list_length(or_list) > 1) ?
+					 makeBoolExpr(OR_EXPR, or_list, location) :
+					 linitial(or_list));
+}
 
 /*
  * transformExpr -
@@ -1386,6 +1737,11 @@ transformBoolExpr(ParseState *pstate, BoolExpr *a)
 		args = lappend(args, arg);
 	}
 
+	/* Make an attempt to group similar OR clauses into ANY operation */
+	if (enable_or_transformation && a->boolop == OR_EXPR &&
+		list_length(args) > 1)
+		return TransformOrExprToANY(pstate, args, a->location);
+
 	return (Node *) makeBoolExpr(a->boolop, args, a->location);
 }
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c
index 45013582a7..c0ea53495b 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c
@@ -1026,6 +1026,17 @@ struct config_bool ConfigureNamesBool[] =
 		true,
 		NULL, NULL, NULL
 	},
+	{
+		{"enable_or_transformation", PGC_USERSET, QUERY_TUNING_OTHER,
+			gettext_noop("Transform a sequence of OR clauses to an array expression."),
+			gettext_noop("The planner will replace expression like 'x=c1 OR x=c2 ..'"
+						 "to the expression 'x = ANY(ARRAY[c1,c2,..])'"),
+			GUC_EXPLAIN
+		},
+		&enable_or_transformation,
+		true,
+		NULL, NULL, NULL
+	},
 	{
 		/*
 		 * Not for general use --- used by SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION and SET
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
index edcc0282b2..d30dc6d51c 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@
 # - Planner Method Configuration -
 
 #enable_async_append = on
+#enable_or_transformation = on
 #enable_bitmapscan = on
 #enable_gathermerge = on
 #enable_hashagg = on
diff --git a/src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl b/src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl
index 00b5092713..d28bf617db 100644
--- a/src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl
+++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/t/002_pg_dump.pl
@@ -2095,9 +2095,9 @@ my %tests = (
 		regexp => qr/^
 			\QCREATE DOMAIN dump_test.us_postal_code AS text COLLATE pg_catalog."C" DEFAULT '10014'::text\E\n\s+
 			\QCONSTRAINT us_postal_code_check CHECK \E
-			\Q(((VALUE ~ '^\d{5}\E
-			\$\Q'::text) OR (VALUE ~ '^\d{5}-\d{4}\E\$
-			\Q'::text)));\E(.|\n)*
+			\Q((VALUE ~ ANY (ARRAY['^\d{5}\E
+			\$\Q'::text, '^\d{5}-\d{4}\E\$
+			\Q'::text])));\E(.|\n)*
 			\QCOMMENT ON CONSTRAINT us_postal_code_check ON DOMAIN dump_test.us_postal_code IS 'check it';\E
 			/xm,
 		like =>
diff --git a/src/include/nodes/queryjumble.h b/src/include/nodes/queryjumble.h
index f1c55c8067..a9ae048af5 100644
--- a/src/include/nodes/queryjumble.h
+++ b/src/include/nodes/queryjumble.h
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT int compute_query_id;
 
 extern const char *CleanQuerytext(const char *query, int *location, int *len);
 extern JumbleState *JumbleQuery(Query *query);
+extern JumbleState *JumbleExpr(Expr *expr, uint64 *queryId);
 extern void EnableQueryId(void);
 
 extern PGDLLIMPORT bool query_id_enabled;
diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h b/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h
index 7b63c5cf71..0ee7154e08 100644
--- a/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h
+++ b/src/include/optimizer/optimizer.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct PlannedStmt;
 struct ParamListInfoData;
 struct HeapTupleData;
 
+extern PGDLLIMPORT bool enable_or_transformation;
 
 /* in path/clausesel.c: */
 
@@ -159,6 +160,15 @@ extern List *expand_function_arguments(List *args, bool include_out_arguments,
 
 /* in util/predtest.c: */
 
+/*
+ * Proof attempts involving large arrays in ScalarArrayOpExpr nodes are
+ * likely to require O(N^2) time, and more often than not fail anyway.
+ * So we set an arbitrary limit on the number of array elements that
+ * we will allow to be treated as an AND or OR clause.
+ * XXX is it worth exposing this as a GUC knob?
+ */
+#define MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE		100
+
 extern bool predicate_implied_by(List *predicate_list, List *clause_list,
 								 bool weak);
 extern bool predicate_refuted_by(List *predicate_list, List *clause_list,
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out b/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out
index 79fa117cb5..606a4399f9 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/create_index.out
@@ -1838,18 +1838,50 @@ DROP TABLE onek_with_null;
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT * FROM tenk1
   WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3 OR tenthous = 42);
-                                                               QUERY PLAN                                                                
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
-   Recheck Cond: (((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = 1)) OR ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = 3)) OR ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = 42)))
-   ->  BitmapOr
-         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
-               Index Cond: ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = 1))
-         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
-               Index Cond: ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = 3))
-         ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
-               Index Cond: ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = 42))
-(9 rows)
+                                  QUERY PLAN                                  
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Index Scan using tenk1_thous_tenthous on tenk1
+   Index Cond: ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = ANY ('{1,3,42}'::integer[])))
+(2 rows)
+
+SELECT * FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3 OR tenthous = 42);
+ unique1 | unique2 | two | four | ten | twenty | hundred | thousand | twothousand | fivethous | tenthous | odd | even | stringu1 | stringu2 | string4 
+---------+---------+-----+------+-----+--------+---------+----------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----+------+----------+----------+---------
+      42 |    5530 |   0 |    2 |   2 |      2 |      42 |       42 |          42 |        42 |       42 |  84 |   85 | QBAAAA   | SEIAAA   | OOOOxx
+(1 row)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
+                                     QUERY PLAN                                     
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
+         Recheck Cond: ((hundred = 42) AND (thousand = ANY ('{42,99}'::integer[])))
+         ->  BitmapAnd
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_hundred
+                     Index Cond: (hundred = 42)
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                     Index Cond: (thousand = ANY ('{42,99}'::integer[]))
+(8 rows)
+
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
+ count 
+-------
+    10
+(1 row)
+
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT * FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3 OR tenthous = 42);
+                                  QUERY PLAN                                  
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Index Scan using tenk1_thous_tenthous on tenk1
+   Index Cond: ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = ANY ('{1,3,42}'::integer[])))
+(2 rows)
 
 SELECT * FROM tenk1
   WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3 OR tenthous = 42);
@@ -1861,28 +1893,116 @@ SELECT * FROM tenk1
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
   WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
-                                   QUERY PLAN                                    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+                                     QUERY PLAN                                     
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
+         Recheck Cond: ((hundred = 42) AND (thousand = ANY ('{42,99}'::integer[])))
+         ->  BitmapAnd
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_hundred
+                     Index Cond: (hundred = 42)
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                     Index Cond: (thousand = ANY ('{42,99}'::integer[]))
+(8 rows)
+
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
+ count 
+-------
+    10
+(1 row)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand < 42 OR thousand < 99 OR 43 > thousand OR 42 > thousand);
+                                      QUERY PLAN                                       
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
+         Recheck Cond: ((hundred = 42) AND (thousand < ANY ('{42,99,43}'::integer[])))
+         ->  BitmapAnd
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_hundred
+                     Index Cond: (hundred = 42)
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                     Index Cond: (thousand < ANY ('{42,99,43}'::integer[]))
+(8 rows)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3) OR thousand = 41;
+                                               QUERY PLAN                                               
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
+         Recheck Cond: (((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = ANY ('{1,3}'::integer[]))) OR (thousand = 41))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                     Index Cond: ((thousand = 42) AND (tenthous = ANY ('{1,3}'::integer[])))
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                     Index Cond: (thousand = 41)
+(8 rows)
+
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3) OR thousand = 41;
+ count 
+-------
+    10
+(1 row)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99 OR tenthous < 2) OR thousand = 41;
+                                                         QUERY PLAN                                                          
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Aggregate
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
+         Recheck Cond: (((hundred = 42) AND ((thousand = ANY ('{42,99}'::integer[])) OR (tenthous < 2))) OR (thousand = 41))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  BitmapAnd
+                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_hundred
+                           Index Cond: (hundred = 42)
+                     ->  BitmapOr
+                           ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                                 Index Cond: (thousand = ANY ('{42,99}'::integer[]))
+                           ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                                 Index Cond: (tenthous < 2)
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
+                     Index Cond: (thousand = 41)
+(14 rows)
+
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99 OR tenthous < 2) OR thousand = 41;
+ count 
+-------
+    20
+(1 row)
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 41 OR thousand = 99 AND tenthous = 2);
+                                                          QUERY PLAN                                                          
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Aggregate
    ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1
-         Recheck Cond: ((hundred = 42) AND ((thousand = 42) OR (thousand = 99)))
+         Recheck Cond: ((hundred = 42) AND ((thousand = ANY ('{42,41}'::integer[])) OR ((thousand = 99) AND (tenthous = 2))))
          ->  BitmapAnd
                ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_hundred
                      Index Cond: (hundred = 42)
                ->  BitmapOr
                      ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
-                           Index Cond: (thousand = 42)
+                           Index Cond: (thousand = ANY ('{42,41}'::integer[]))
                      ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_thous_tenthous
-                           Index Cond: (thousand = 99)
+                           Index Cond: ((thousand = 99) AND (tenthous = 2))
 (11 rows)
 
 SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
-  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 41 OR thousand = 99 AND tenthous = 2);
  count 
 -------
     10
 (1 row)
 
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
 --
 -- Check behavior with duplicate index column contents
 --
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
index 9605400021..d8018bef4f 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
@@ -4210,10 +4210,10 @@ explain (costs off)
 select * from tenk1 a join tenk1 b on
   (a.unique1 = 1 and b.unique1 = 2) or
   ((a.unique2 = 3 or a.unique2 = 7) and b.hundred = 4);
-                                                      QUERY PLAN                                                      
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+                                                       QUERY PLAN                                                       
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Nested Loop
-   Join Filter: (((a.unique1 = 1) AND (b.unique1 = 2)) OR (((a.unique2 = 3) OR (a.unique2 = 7)) AND (b.hundred = 4)))
+   Join Filter: (((a.unique1 = 1) AND (b.unique1 = 2)) OR ((a.unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[])) AND (b.hundred = 4)))
    ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1 b
          Recheck Cond: ((unique1 = 2) OR (hundred = 4))
          ->  BitmapOr
@@ -4223,16 +4223,64 @@ select * from tenk1 a join tenk1 b on
                      Index Cond: (hundred = 4)
    ->  Materialize
          ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1 a
-               Recheck Cond: ((unique1 = 1) OR (unique2 = 3) OR (unique2 = 7))
+               Recheck Cond: ((unique1 = 1) OR (unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[])))
                ->  BitmapOr
                      ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique1
                            Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
                      ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique2
-                           Index Cond: (unique2 = 3)
+                           Index Cond: (unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[]))
+(17 rows)
+
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+explain (costs off)
+select * from tenk1 a join tenk1 b on
+  (a.unique1 = 1 and b.unique1 = 2) or
+  ((a.unique2 = 3 or a.unique2 = 7) and b.hundred = 4);
+                                                       QUERY PLAN                                                       
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Nested Loop
+   Join Filter: (((a.unique1 = 1) AND (b.unique1 = 2)) OR ((a.unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[])) AND (b.hundred = 4)))
+   ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1 b
+         Recheck Cond: ((unique1 = 2) OR (hundred = 4))
+         ->  BitmapOr
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique1
+                     Index Cond: (unique1 = 2)
+               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_hundred
+                     Index Cond: (hundred = 4)
+   ->  Materialize
+         ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1 a
+               Recheck Cond: ((unique1 = 1) OR (unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[])))
+               ->  BitmapOr
+                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique1
+                           Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
                      ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique2
-                           Index Cond: (unique2 = 7)
-(19 rows)
+                           Index Cond: (unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[]))
+(17 rows)
+
+explain (costs off)
+select * from tenk1 a join tenk1 b on
+  (a.unique1 < 20 or a.unique1 = 3 or a.unique1 = 1 and b.unique1 = 2) or
+  ((a.unique2 = 3 or a.unique2 = 7) and b.hundred = 4);
+                                                                          QUERY PLAN                                                                           
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Nested Loop
+   Join Filter: ((a.unique1 < 20) OR (a.unique1 = 3) OR ((a.unique1 = 1) AND (b.unique1 = 2)) OR ((a.unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[])) AND (b.hundred = 4)))
+   ->  Seq Scan on tenk1 b
+   ->  Materialize
+         ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tenk1 a
+               Recheck Cond: ((unique1 < 20) OR (unique1 = 3) OR (unique1 = 1) OR (unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[])))
+               ->  BitmapOr
+                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique1
+                           Index Cond: (unique1 < 20)
+                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique1
+                           Index Cond: (unique1 = 3)
+                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique1
+                           Index Cond: (unique1 = 1)
+                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tenk1_unique2
+                           Index Cond: (unique2 = ANY ('{3,7}'::integer[]))
+(15 rows)
 
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
 --
 -- test placement of movable quals in a parameterized join tree
 --
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
index bf0657b9f2..1e153c3bb5 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
@@ -82,25 +82,47 @@ explain (costs off) select * from lp where a is null;
 (2 rows)
 
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a = 'a' or a = 'c';
-                        QUERY PLAN                        
-----------------------------------------------------------
+                  QUERY PLAN                   
+-----------------------------------------------
  Append
    ->  Seq Scan on lp_ad lp_1
-         Filter: ((a = 'a'::bpchar) OR (a = 'c'::bpchar))
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[]))
    ->  Seq Scan on lp_bc lp_2
-         Filter: ((a = 'a'::bpchar) OR (a = 'c'::bpchar))
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[]))
 (5 rows)
 
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a is not null and (a = 'a' or a = 'c');
-                                   QUERY PLAN                                   
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+                             QUERY PLAN                              
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
  Append
    ->  Seq Scan on lp_ad lp_1
-         Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND ((a = 'a'::bpchar) OR (a = 'c'::bpchar)))
+         Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[])))
    ->  Seq Scan on lp_bc lp_2
-         Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND ((a = 'a'::bpchar) OR (a = 'c'::bpchar)))
+         Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[])))
 (5 rows)
 
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+explain (costs off) select * from lp where a = 'a' or a = 'c';
+                  QUERY PLAN                   
+-----------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on lp_ad lp_1
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[]))
+   ->  Seq Scan on lp_bc lp_2
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[]))
+(5 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from lp where a is not null and (a = 'a' or a = 'c');
+                             QUERY PLAN                              
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on lp_ad lp_1
+         Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[])))
+   ->  Seq Scan on lp_bc lp_2
+         Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (a = ANY ('{a,c}'::bpchar[])))
+(5 rows)
+
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a <> 'g';
              QUERY PLAN             
 ------------------------------------
@@ -515,10 +537,10 @@ explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a <= 31;
 (27 rows)
 
 explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 or a = 7;
-           QUERY PLAN           
---------------------------------
+                QUERY PLAN                
+------------------------------------------
  Seq Scan on rlp2 rlp
-   Filter: ((a = 1) OR (a = 7))
+   Filter: (a = ANY ('{1,7}'::integer[]))
 (2 rows)
 
 explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 or b = 'ab';
@@ -596,13 +618,13 @@ explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a < 1 or (a > 20 and a < 25);
 
 -- where clause contradicts sub-partition's constraint
 explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 20 or a = 40;
-               QUERY PLAN               
-----------------------------------------
+                    QUERY PLAN                    
+--------------------------------------------------
  Append
    ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_1 rlp_1
-         Filter: ((a = 20) OR (a = 40))
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{20,40}'::integer[]))
    ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_default rlp_2
-         Filter: ((a = 20) OR (a = 40))
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{20,40}'::integer[]))
 (5 rows)
 
 explain (costs off) select * from rlp3 where a = 20;   /* empty */
@@ -671,6 +693,163 @@ explain (costs off) select * from rlp where (a = 1 and a = 3) or (a > 1 and a =
          Filter: (((a = 1) AND (a = 3)) OR ((a > 1) AND (a = 15)))
 (11 rows)
 
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 or a = 7;
+                QUERY PLAN                
+------------------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on rlp2 rlp
+   Filter: (a = ANY ('{1,7}'::integer[]))
+(2 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 or b = 'ab';
+                      QUERY PLAN                       
+-------------------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp1 rlp_1
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp2 rlp_2
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3abcd rlp_3
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_1 rlp_4
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_2 rlp_5
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_default rlp_6
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_1 rlp_7
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_default rlp_8
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_10 rlp_9
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_30 rlp_10
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_null rlp_11
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_default rlp_12
+         Filter: ((a = 1) OR ((b)::text = 'ab'::text))
+(25 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 20 and a < 27;
+               QUERY PLAN                
+-----------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_1 rlp_1
+         Filter: ((a > 20) AND (a < 27))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_2 rlp_2
+         Filter: ((a > 20) AND (a < 27))
+(5 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 29;
+          QUERY PLAN          
+------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on rlp4_default rlp
+   Filter: (a = 29)
+(2 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a >= 29;
+                 QUERY PLAN                  
+---------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_default rlp_1
+         Filter: (a >= 29)
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_1 rlp_2
+         Filter: (a >= 29)
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_default rlp_3
+         Filter: (a >= 29)
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_30 rlp_4
+         Filter: (a >= 29)
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_default rlp_5
+         Filter: (a >= 29)
+(11 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a < 1 or (a > 20 and a < 25);
+                      QUERY PLAN                      
+------------------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp1 rlp_1
+         Filter: ((a < 1) OR ((a > 20) AND (a < 25)))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_1 rlp_2
+         Filter: ((a < 1) OR ((a > 20) AND (a < 25)))
+(5 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 20 or a = 40;
+                    QUERY PLAN                    
+--------------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_1 rlp_1
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{20,40}'::integer[]))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_default rlp_2
+         Filter: (a = ANY ('{20,40}'::integer[]))
+(5 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp3 where a = 20;   /* empty */
+        QUERY PLAN        
+--------------------------
+ Result
+   One-Time Filter: false
+(2 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a = 10;	/* only default */
+            QUERY PLAN            
+----------------------------------
+ Seq Scan on rlp_default_10 rlp
+   Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a = 10))
+(2 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a >=15;	/* rlp3 onwards, including default */
+                  QUERY PLAN                  
+----------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3abcd rlp_1
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3efgh rlp_2
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3nullxy rlp_3
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3_default rlp_4
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_1 rlp_5
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_2 rlp_6
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp4_default rlp_7
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_1 rlp_8
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp5_default rlp_9
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_30 rlp_10
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp_default_default rlp_11
+         Filter: ((a > 1) AND (a >= 15))
+(23 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 and a = 3;	/* empty */
+        QUERY PLAN        
+--------------------------
+ Result
+   One-Time Filter: false
+(2 rows)
+
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where (a = 1 and a = 3) or (a > 1 and a = 15);
+                            QUERY PLAN                             
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Append
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp2 rlp_1
+         Filter: (((a = 1) AND (a = 3)) OR ((a > 1) AND (a = 15)))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3abcd rlp_2
+         Filter: (((a = 1) AND (a = 3)) OR ((a > 1) AND (a = 15)))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3efgh rlp_3
+         Filter: (((a = 1) AND (a = 3)) OR ((a > 1) AND (a = 15)))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3nullxy rlp_4
+         Filter: (((a = 1) AND (a = 3)) OR ((a > 1) AND (a = 15)))
+   ->  Seq Scan on rlp3_default rlp_5
+         Filter: (((a = 1) AND (a = 3)) OR ((a > 1) AND (a = 15)))
+(11 rows)
+
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
 -- multi-column keys
 create table mc3p (a int, b int, c int) partition by range (a, abs(b), c);
 create table mc3p_default partition of mc3p default;
@@ -2072,10 +2251,10 @@ explain (costs off) select * from hp where a = 1 and b = 'abcde';
 
 explain (costs off) select * from hp where a = 1 and b = 'abcde' and
   (c = 2 or c = 3);
-                              QUERY PLAN                              
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+                                   QUERY PLAN                                   
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Seq Scan on hp2 hp
-   Filter: ((a = 1) AND (b = 'abcde'::text) AND ((c = 2) OR (c = 3)))
+   Filter: ((c = ANY ('{2,3}'::integer[])) AND (a = 1) AND (b = 'abcde'::text))
 (2 rows)
 
 drop table hp2;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/stats_ext.out b/src/test/regress/expected/stats_ext.out
index 10903bdab0..6f55b9e3ec 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/stats_ext.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/stats_ext.out
@@ -1322,19 +1322,19 @@ SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE
 SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE (a = 1 OR a = 51) AND b = ''1''');
  estimated | actual 
 -----------+--------
-        99 |    100
+       100 |    100
 (1 row)
 
 SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE (a = 1 OR a = 51) AND (b = ''1'' OR b = ''2'')');
  estimated | actual 
 -----------+--------
-        99 |    100
+       100 |    100
 (1 row)
 
 SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE (a = 1 OR a = 2 OR a = 51 OR a = 52) AND (b = ''1'' OR b = ''2'')');
  estimated | actual 
 -----------+--------
-       197 |    200
+       200 |    200
 (1 row)
 
 -- OR clauses referencing different attributes are incompatible
@@ -1664,19 +1664,19 @@ SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE
 SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE ((a * 2) = 2 OR (a * 2) = 102) AND upper(b) = ''1''');
  estimated | actual 
 -----------+--------
-        99 |    100
+       100 |    100
 (1 row)
 
 SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE ((a * 2) = 2 OR (a * 2) = 102) AND (upper(b) = ''1'' OR upper(b) = ''2'')');
  estimated | actual 
 -----------+--------
-        99 |    100
+       100 |    100
 (1 row)
 
 SELECT * FROM check_estimated_rows('SELECT * FROM functional_dependencies WHERE ((a * 2) = 2 OR (a * 2) = 4 OR (a * 2) = 102 OR (a * 2) = 104) AND (upper(b) = ''1'' OR upper(b) = ''2'')');
  estimated | actual 
 -----------+--------
-       197 |    200
+       200 |    200
 (1 row)
 
 -- OR clauses referencing different attributes
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out b/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out
index 9be7aca2b8..1f9029b5b2 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ select name, setting from pg_settings where name like 'enable%';
  enable_memoize                 | on
  enable_mergejoin               | on
  enable_nestloop                | on
+ enable_or_transformation       | on
  enable_parallel_append         | on
  enable_parallel_hash           | on
  enable_partition_pruning       | on
@@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ select name, setting from pg_settings where name like 'enable%';
  enable_seqscan                 | on
  enable_sort                    | on
  enable_tidscan                 | on
-(23 rows)
+(24 rows)
 
 -- There are always wait event descriptions for various types.
 select type, count(*) > 0 as ok FROM pg_wait_events
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/tidscan.out b/src/test/regress/expected/tidscan.out
index f133b5a4ac..2a079e996b 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/tidscan.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/tidscan.out
@@ -43,10 +43,26 @@ SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE '(0,1)' = ctid;
 -- OR'd clauses
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
-                          QUERY PLAN                          
---------------------------------------------------------------
+                      QUERY PLAN                       
+-------------------------------------------------------
+ Tid Scan on tidscan
+   TID Cond: (ctid = ANY ('{"(0,2)","(0,1)"}'::tid[]))
+(2 rows)
+
+SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
+ ctid  | id 
+-------+----
+ (0,1) |  1
+ (0,2) |  2
+(2 rows)
+
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
+                      QUERY PLAN                       
+-------------------------------------------------------
  Tid Scan on tidscan
-   TID Cond: ((ctid = '(0,2)'::tid) OR ('(0,1)'::tid = ctid))
+   TID Cond: (ctid = ANY ('{"(0,2)","(0,1)"}'::tid[]))
 (2 rows)
 
 SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
@@ -56,6 +72,7 @@ SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
  (0,2) |  2
 (2 rows)
 
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
 -- ctid = ScalarArrayOp - implemented as tidscan
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = ANY(ARRAY['(0,1)', '(0,2)']::tid[]);
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/create_index.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/create_index.sql
index d49ce9f300..56fde15bc1 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/create_index.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/create_index.sql
@@ -737,6 +737,41 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
 SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
   WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
 
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT * FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3 OR tenthous = 42);
+SELECT * FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3 OR tenthous = 42);
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand < 42 OR thousand < 99 OR 43 > thousand OR 42 > thousand);
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3) OR thousand = 41;
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3) OR thousand = 41;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99 OR tenthous < 2) OR thousand = 41;
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99 OR tenthous < 2) OR thousand = 41;
+
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 41 OR thousand = 99 AND tenthous = 2);
+SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
+  WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 41 OR thousand = 99 AND tenthous = 2);
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
+
 --
 -- Check behavior with duplicate index column contents
 --
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
index c4c6c7b8ba..1663608043 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
@@ -1408,6 +1408,16 @@ explain (costs off)
 select * from tenk1 a join tenk1 b on
   (a.unique1 = 1 and b.unique1 = 2) or
   ((a.unique2 = 3 or a.unique2 = 7) and b.hundred = 4);
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+explain (costs off)
+select * from tenk1 a join tenk1 b on
+  (a.unique1 = 1 and b.unique1 = 2) or
+  ((a.unique2 = 3 or a.unique2 = 7) and b.hundred = 4);
+explain (costs off)
+select * from tenk1 a join tenk1 b on
+  (a.unique1 < 20 or a.unique1 = 3 or a.unique1 = 1 and b.unique1 = 2) or
+  ((a.unique2 = 3 or a.unique2 = 7) and b.hundred = 4);
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
 
 --
 -- test placement of movable quals in a parameterized join tree
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql
index a09b27d820..9717c8c835 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_prune.sql
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ explain (costs off) select * from lp where a is not null;
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a is null;
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a = 'a' or a = 'c';
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a is not null and (a = 'a' or a = 'c');
+
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+explain (costs off) select * from lp where a = 'a' or a = 'c';
+explain (costs off) select * from lp where a is not null and (a = 'a' or a = 'c');
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
+
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a <> 'g';
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a <> 'a' and a <> 'd';
 explain (costs off) select * from lp where a not in ('a', 'd');
@@ -99,6 +105,22 @@ explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a >=15;	/* rlp3 onwards, i
 explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 and a = 3;	/* empty */
 explain (costs off) select * from rlp where (a = 1 and a = 3) or (a > 1 and a = 15);
 
+
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 or a = 7;
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 or b = 'ab';
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 20 and a < 27;
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 29;
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a >= 29;
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a < 1 or (a > 20 and a < 25);
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 20 or a = 40;
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp3 where a = 20;   /* empty */
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a = 10;	/* only default */
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a > 1 and a >=15;	/* rlp3 onwards, including default */
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where a = 1 and a = 3;	/* empty */
+explain (costs off) select * from rlp where (a = 1 and a = 3) or (a > 1 and a = 15);
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
+
 -- multi-column keys
 create table mc3p (a int, b int, c int) partition by range (a, abs(b), c);
 create table mc3p_default partition of mc3p default;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/tidscan.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/tidscan.sql
index 313e0fb9b6..0499bedb9e 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/tidscan.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/tidscan.sql
@@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
 SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
 
+SET enable_or_transformation = on;
+EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
+SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
+SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = '(0,2)' OR '(0,1)' = ctid;
+RESET enable_or_transformation;
+
 -- ctid = ScalarArrayOp - implemented as tidscan
 EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
 SELECT ctid, * FROM tidscan WHERE ctid = ANY(ARRAY['(0,1)', '(0,2)']::tid[]);
diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
index cc3611e606..f4b6fee893 100644
--- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
+++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
@@ -1656,6 +1656,8 @@ NumericVar
 OM_uint32
 OP
 OSAPerGroupState
+OrClauseGroupEntry
+OrClauseGroupKey
 OSAPerQueryState
 OSInfo
 OSSLCipher
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to