On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 4:59 PM Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepik...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On 28/2/2024 17:27, Alena Rybakina wrote: > > Maybe like that: > > > > It also considers the way to generate a path using BitmapScan indexes, > > converting the transformed expression into expressions separated by "OR" > > operations, and if it turns out to be the best and finally selects the > > best one. > Thanks, > I spent some time describing the feature with documentation. > A condensed description of the GUC is in the runtime-config file. > Feature description has spread between TransformOrExprToANY and > generate_saop_pathlist routines. > Also, I've made tiny changes in the code to look more smoothly. > All modifications are integrated into the two new patches. > > Feel free to add, change or totally rewrite these changes.
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c
b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c
index 93ded31ed9..7d3a1ca238 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c
@@ -1026,6 +1026,17 @@ struct config_bool ConfigureNamesBool[] =
true,
NULL, NULL, NULL
},
+ {
+ {"enable_or_transformation", PGC_USERSET, QUERY_TUNING_OTHER,
+ gettext_noop("Transform a sequence of OR clauses to an IN expression."),
+ gettext_noop("The planner will replace clauses like 'x=c1 OR x=c2 .."
+ "to the clause 'x IN (c1,c2,...)'"),
+ GUC_EXPLAIN
+ },
+ &enable_or_transformation,
+ true,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL
+ },
I think it should be something like:
+ gettext_noop("Transform a sequence of OR expressions to an array
expression."),
+ gettext_noop("The planner will replace expression like 'x=c1 OR x=c2 "
+ "to the expression 'x = ANY( ARRAY[c1,c2])''"
+JumbleState *
+JumbleExpr(Expr *expr, uint64 *queryId)
+{
+ JumbleState *jstate = NULL;
+
+ Assert(queryId != NULL);
+
+ jstate = (JumbleState *) palloc(sizeof(JumbleState));
+
+ /* Set up workspace for query jumbling */
+ jstate->jumble = (unsigned char *) palloc(JUMBLE_SIZE);
+ jstate->jumble_len = 0;
+ jstate->clocations_buf_size = 32;
+ jstate->clocations = (LocationLen *)
+ palloc(jstate->clocations_buf_size * sizeof(LocationLen));
+ jstate->clocations_count = 0;
+ jstate->highest_extern_param_id = 0;
+
+ /* Compute query ID */
+ _jumbleNode(jstate, (Node *) expr);
+ *queryId = DatumGetUInt64(hash_any_extended(jstate->jumble,
+ jstate->jumble_len,
+ 0));
+
+ return jstate;
+}
queryId may not be a good variable name here?
comment `/* Compute query ID */`
seems not correct, here we are just hashing the expression?
+/*
+ * Dynahash match function to use in guc_hashtab
+ */
+static int
+orclause_match(const void *data1, const void *data2, Size keysize)
+{
+ OrClauseGroupKey *key1 = (OrClauseGroupKey *) data1;
+ OrClauseGroupKey *key2 = (OrClauseGroupKey *) data2;
+
+ Assert(sizeof(OrClauseGroupKey) == keysize);
+
+ if (key1->opno == key2->opno && key1->exprtype == key2->exprtype &&
+ equal(key1->expr, key2->expr))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
the above comments seem not correct?
<para>
Enables or disables the query planner's ability to lookup and
group multiple
similar OR expressions to ANY (<xref
linkend="functions-comparisons-any-some"/>) expressions.
The grouping technique of this transformation is based on the
similarity of variable sides.
It applies to equality expressions only. One side of such an expression
must be a constant clause, and the other must contain a variable clause.
The default is <literal>on</literal>.
Also, during BitmapScan paths generation it enables analysis of elements
of IN or ANY constant arrays to cover such clause with BitmapOr set of
partial index scans.
</para>
` It applies to equality expressions only.` seems not correct?
`select * from tenk1 where unique1 < 1 or unique1 < 2; ` can also do
the transformation.
`similarity of variable sides.` seems not correct,
should it be 'sameness of the variable sides`?
in [1], we can get:
expression IN (value [, ...])
is equivalent to
expression = value1
OR
expression = value2
OR
in [2], we can get:
SOME is a synonym for ANY. IN is equivalent to = ANY.
but still transforming OR to ANY is not intuitive.
a normal user may not know what is "transforming OR to ANY".
so maybe adding a simple example at
<varlistentry id="guc-enable-or-transformation"
xreflabel="enable_or_transformation">
would be great. which, I did at previous thread.
I also did some refactoring based on v18, attached.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-comparisons.html#FUNCTIONS-COMPARISONS-IN-SCALAR
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-subquery.html#FUNCTIONS-SUBQUERY-ANY-SOME
v18-0001-Minor-miscellaneous-refactor-based-on-v18.no-cfbot
Description: Binary data
