On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 00:24, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, hackers! > In the measurements above in the thread, I've been using LIFO wake > queue in a primary lockless patch (and it was attached as the previous > versions of a patch) and an "inverted wake queue" (in faсt FIFO) as > the alternative benchmarking option. I think using the latter is more > fair and natural and provided they show no difference in the speed, > I'd make the main patch using it (attached as v6). No other changes > from v5, though.
There has not been much interest on this as the thread has been idle for more than a year now. I'm not sure if we should take it forward or not. I would prefer to close this in the current commitfest unless someone wants to take it further. Regards, Vignesh
