On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 11:08:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: >> While thinking about that, a second idea came into my mind: a >> superuser-settable developer GUC to disable such WAL records to be >> generated within certain areas of the test. This requires a small >> implementation, but nothing really huge, while being portable >> everywhere. And it is not the first time I've been annoyed with these >> records when wanting a predictible set of WAL records for some test >> case. > > Hmm ... I see what you are after, but to what extent would this mean > that what we are testing is not our real-world behavior?
Don't think so. We don't care much about these records when it comes to checking slot invalidation scenarios with a predictible XID horizon, AFAIK. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
