Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> While thinking about that, a second idea came into my mind: a
> superuser-settable developer GUC to disable such WAL records to be
> generated within certain areas of the test. This requires a small
> implementation, but nothing really huge, while being portable
> everywhere. And it is not the first time I've been annoyed with these
> records when wanting a predictible set of WAL records for some test
> case.
Hmm ... I see what you are after, but to what extent would this mean
that what we are testing is not our real-world behavior?
regards, tom lane
