On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:25:44AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 9:08 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Hence, how about something like that:
>> "The logical replication launcher is disabled during binary upgrades,
>> as a logical replication workers running on the cluster upgrading from
>> could cause replication origins to move forward after they are copied
>> to the cluster upgrading to, creating potentially conflicts with the
>> physical files copied over."
> 
> Looks better. One minor nitpick: /potentially/potential

Sure, WFM.  Let's wait a bit and see if others have more comments to
offer.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to