On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:40:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 02:58:55PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > I'm not a Windows expert, but my guess is that 0001 is a very good > > idea. I hope someone who is a Windows expert will comment on that. > > I am +1 on 0001. It is just something we've never anticipated when > these wrappers around cmd in pg_ctl were written.
I have now applied 0001 for pg_ctl. While reviewing that, I have also noticed spawn_process() in pg_regress.c that includes direct command invocations with cmd.exe /c. Could it make sense to append an extra /d for this case as well? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
