Jelte Fennema-Nio <postg...@jeltef.nl> writes:
> The "we expect" reads to me as if we're not very sure that compilers
> do this optimization. Even though we are quite sure. Maybe some small
> changes like this to clarify that.
> The outer loop only does a single iteration, so we expect that **any**
> optimizing compilers will unroll it, thereby optimizing it away. **We
> know for sure that gcc and clang do this optimization.**
I like Nathan's wording. Your assertion is contradicted by cases as
obvious as -O0, and I'm sure a lot of other holes could be poked in it
as well (e.g, just how far back might gcc choose to do that unrolling?
Does the size of the loop body matter?)
regards, tom lane
