Thanks. I've attached the latest version that updates the naming in line with the convention.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:46 AM jian he <jian.universal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:44 AM Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Patch updated for those comments (and a touch of cleanup in the tests) > > attached. > > it would be a better name as hash_ltree than ltree_hash, similar logic > applies to ltree_hash_extended. > that would be the convention. see: > https://stackoverflow.com/a/69650940/15603477 > > > Other than that, it looks good.
0001-ltree-hash-v4.patch
Description: Binary data
