On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:44 AM Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Patch updated for those comments (and a touch of cleanup in the tests) > attached.
it would be a better name as hash_ltree than ltree_hash, similar logic applies to ltree_hash_extended. that would be the convention. see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69650940/15603477 Other than that, it looks good.
