On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:02 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm having a hard time not believing that this is a compiler bug. > Looking back at 8d2a01ae12cd and its speculation that xlc is overly > liberal about reordering code around sequence points ... I wonder > if it'd help to do this calculation in a local variable, and only > assign the final value to result->time ? But we have to reproduce > the problem first.
If that can be shown I would vote for switching to /opt/IBM/xlc/16.1.0 and not changing a single bit of PostgreSQL.
