On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 06:47:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Another possibly interesting factoid: it appears that before > 97957fdba, we had zero regression test coverage of timetz_zone --- > and we still have none of timetz_izone, which contains essentially > the same code. So if there is a problem here, whether it's ours or > the compiler's, it's not hard to see why we didn't notice.
Right. This one is just a lucky, or say unlucky find. I didn't notice that this path was entirely missing coverage, planting an assertion in the middle of timetz_zone() passes check-world. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
