On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 16:20, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 21:17, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here are some more thoughts on how we could improve this:
> >
> > 1. Adjust the definition of StringInfoData.maxlen to define that -1
> > means the StringInfoData's buffer is externally managed.
> > 2. Adjust enlargeStringInfo() to add a check for maxlen = -1 and have
> > it palloc, say, pg_next_pow2(str->len * 2) bytes and memcpy the
> > existing (externally managed string) into the newly palloc'd buffer.
> > 3. Add a new function along the lines of what I originally proposed to
> > allow init of a StringInfoData using an existing allocated string
> > which sets maxlen = -1.
> > 4. Update all the existing places, including the ones I just committed
> > (plus the ones you committed in ba1e066e4) to make use of the function
> > added in #3.
>
> I just spent the past few hours playing around with the attached WIP
> patch to try to clean up the various places where we manually build
> StringInfoDatas around the tree.
>
> While working on this, I added an Assert in the new
> initStringInfoFromStringWithLen function to ensure that data[len] ==
> '\0' per the "There is guaranteed to be a terminating '\0' at
> data[len]" comment in stringinfo.h. It looks like we have some
> existing breakers of this rule.
>
> If you apply the attached patch to 608fd198de~1 and ignore the
> rejected hunks from the deserial functions, you'll see an Assert
> failure during 023_twophase_stream.pl
>
> 023_twophase_stream_subscriber.log indicates:
> TRAP: failed Assert("data[len] == '\0'"), File:
> "../../../../src/include/lib/stringinfo.h", Line: 97, PID: 1073141
> postgres: subscriber: logical replication parallel apply worker for
> subscription 16396 (ExceptionalCondition+0x70)[0x56160451e9d0]
> postgres: subscriber: logical replication parallel apply worker for
> subscription 16396 (ParallelApplyWorkerMain+0x53c)[0x5616043618cc]
> postgres: subscriber: logical replication parallel apply worker for
> subscription 16396 (StartBackgroundWorker+0x20b)[0x56160434452b]
>
> So it seems like we have some existing issues with
> LogicalParallelApplyLoop(). The code there does not properly NUL
> terminate the StringInfoData.data field. There are some examples in
> exec_bind_message() of how that could be fixed. I've CC'd Amit to let
> him know about this.
Thanks for reporting this issue, I was able to reproduce this issue
with the steps provided. I will analyze further and start a new thread
to provide the details of the same.
Regards,
Vignesh
