On 2023-09-15 19:02, Damir Belyalov wrote:
Since v5 patch failed applying anymore, updated the patch.

Thank you for updating the patch . I made a little review on it where
corrected some formatting.


Thanks for your review and update!
I don't have objections the modification of the codes and comments.
Although v7 patch doesn't have commit messages on the patch, I think leave commit message is good for reviewers.

- COPY with a datatype error that can't be handled as a soft error

I didn't know proper way to test this, but I've found data type
widget's
input function widget_in() defined to occur hard-error in regress.c,
attached patch added a test using it.

This test seems to be weird a bit, because of the "widget" type. The
hard error is thrown by the previous test with missing data. Also
it'll be interesting for me to list all cases when a hard error can be
thrown.

Although missing data error is hard error, the suggestion from Andres was adding `dataype` error:

- COPY with a datatype error that can't be handled as a soft error

As described in widghet_in(), widget is intentionally left emitting hard error for testing purpose:

* Note: DON'T convert this error to "soft" style (errsave/ereturn). We * want this data type to stay permanently in the hard-error world so that
  * it can be used for testing that such cases still work reasonably.

From this point of view, I think this is a supposed way of using widget.
OTOH widget is declared in create_type.sql and I'm not sure it's ok to use it in another test copy2.sql.

--
Regards,

--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA Group Corporation


Reply via email to