Re: Document that PG_TRY block cannot have a return statement

[Tom Lane]

Serpent <serpent7...@gmail.com> writes:
> I created a tiny patch that documents that the code block following
> PG_TRY() cannot have any return statement.

AFAIK, this is wrong.  The actual requirement is already stated
in the comment:

 * ... The error recovery code
 * can either do PG_RE_THROW to propagate the error outwards, or do a
 * (sub)transaction abort.

                        regards, tom lane