On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 1:53 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:58 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I hope we get "snapshot too old" back one day. > > Thanks for working on this. Though I wonder why you didn't do > something closer to a straight revert of the feature. Why is nbtree > still passing around snapshots needlessly? > > Also, why are there still many comments referencing the feature? > There's the one above should_attempt_truncation(), for example. > Another appears above init_toast_snapshot(). Are these just > oversights, or was it deliberate? You said something about retaining > vestiges.
Oh. Not intentional. Looking now...
