> > Arguing with people and telling them that they're wrong or (as you appear > to be doing) that they're old and out of touch isn't going to make them any > more likely to want to use your code. >
You are totally wrong, I didn't it, especial called somebody "old". Perhaps you think like this because I wrote next: > Key developers will be changed by people with another experience and > habits (and maybe younger). In this context under "younger" I mean different experience are getting now a new generation of developers. They don't know "news", "mailists", "bbc", "fidonet", "IRC", "perl", "C" and true terminals, but they know "github", "python", "C++", "Java", "gitter", "discord", "JS". It's all this not a bad it's just obvious difference. Even more, I think "old" experience better, but all this experience dictates development styles and tools. There are many projects I've spent weeks developing code for a feature that > I thought was the business, only to have the maintainer and/or users say > "no thanks": that's the spirit of open source. > I agree, I know it but also I still think change build process really need for Postgres community for growing. At now, I can't see "no thanks". I notice that you ignored the two other paragraphs of my email. I > appreciate that you're finding this frustrating but selectively picking > like that rarely helps a discussion progress beyond point-scoring. > Because, I agree with this obvious things and not understand how it tied with our discussion. Looks like you understood my words in wrong key. Sorry for that.
