On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:54:40PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > Please see the attached v4 patch set addressing all the review comments.
- desc = GetRmgr(XLogRecGetRmid(record));
- id = desc.rm_identify(XLogRecGetInfo(record));
-
- if (id == NULL)
- id = psprintf("UNKNOWN (%x)", XLogRecGetInfo(record) & ~XLR_INFO_MASK);
-
- initStringInfo(&rec_desc);
- desc.rm_desc(&rec_desc, record);
-
- /* Block references. */
- initStringInfo(&rec_blk_ref);
- XLogRecGetBlockRefInfo(record, false, true, &rec_blk_ref, &fpi_len);
-
- main_data_len = XLogRecGetDataLen(record);
I don't see any need to move this block of code? This leads to
unnecessary diffs, potentially making backpatch a bit harder. Either
way is not a big deal, still.. Except for this bit, 0001 looks fine
by me.
OUT reltablespace oid,
OUT reldatabase oid,
OUT relfilenode oid,
OUT relblocknumber int8,
+ OUT blockid int2,
+ OUT start_lsn pg_lsn,
+ OUT end_lsn pg_lsn,
+ OUT prev_lsn pg_lsn,
I'd still put the LSN data before the three OIDs for consistency with
the structures, though my opinion does not seem to count much..
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
