On 2023-Mar-17, Andres Freund wrote: > I started writing a test for vacuum_defer_cleanup_age while working on the fix > referenced above, but now I am wondering if said energy would be better spent > removing vacuum_defer_cleanup_age alltogether.
+1 I agree it's not useful anymore. > I don't think I have the cycles to push this through in the next weeks, but if > we agree removing vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is a good idea, it seems like a > good idea to mark it as deprecated in 16? Hmm, for the time being, can we just "disable" it by disallowing to set the GUC to a value different from 0? Then we can remove the code later in the cycle at leisure. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La gente vulgar sólo piensa en pasar el tiempo; el que tiene talento, en aprovecharlo"
