On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Possible. But IIRC the parameter-unknown form isn't valid C++ and Peter > Eisentraut has done a good chunk of work to make it possible to compile > postgres as that. We shouldn't make his job harder.
Fair point. > IMO the important > part isn't that the parameters fit exactly - we'll have to cast for the > return type anyway - but that it's declared as a pointer-to-function for > the hyptothetical supported platform that has different pointers to > functions than to other objects. Probably the more relevant concern is what's going to compile warning-free on all supported compilers. I think it's unlikely that such a hypothetical supported platform actually exists, although maybe I'm wrong. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
