On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I dug up a thread about the introduction of the warning: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00423.html > > Sounds like we should add something like > typedef void (*GenericFuncPtr) (void); > or such? Similar to what Tom proposed upthread.
His proposal was void (*)() rather than void (*)(void). I see that the email to which you linked expects the latter, but I guess I would have expected the former to be an intentional statement that we don't know what the parameter list is. My expectations may be wrong, though, or just irrelevant. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
