Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 22 Feb 2023, at 21:33, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2023-02-22 15:10:11 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Rebased patch to handle breakage of v2 due to bd8d453e9b.
>> I think we probably should just apply this? The current behaviour doesn't
>> seem
>> right, and I don't see a downside of the new behaviour?
> Agreed, I can't think of a regression test where we wouldn't want this. My
> only concern was if any of the ECPG tests were doing something odd that would
> break from this but I can't see anything.
+1. I was a bit surprised to realize that we might not count such
a case as a failure.
regards, tom lane
