> On 22 Feb 2023, at 21:33, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2023-02-22 15:10:11 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Rebased patch to handle breakage of v2 due to bd8d453e9b. > > I think we probably should just apply this? The current behaviour doesn't seem > right, and I don't see a downside of the new behaviour? Agreed, I can't think of a regression test where we wouldn't want this. My only concern was if any of the ECPG tests were doing something odd that would break from this but I can't see anything. -- Daniel Gustafsson
