On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:54:57AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > As another example, the mechanisms we use to create the typedefs list > in the first place are pretty squishy/leaky: they depend on which > buildfarm animals are running the typedef-generation step, and on > whether anything's broken lately in that code --- which happens on > a fairly regular basis (eg [1]). Maybe that could be improved, > but I don't see an easy way to capture the set of system-defined > typedefs that are in use on platforms other than your own. I > definitely do not want to go over to hand maintenance of that list.
As I now understand it, we would need to standardize on a typedef list at the beginning of each major development cycle, and then only allow additions, and the addition would have to include any pgindent affects of the addition. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect, which you will never be.
