Em seg., 16 de jan. de 2023 às 03:28, John Naylor < john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> escreveu:
> > I wrote: > > ...but arguably the earlier check is close enough that it's silly to > assert in the "else" branch, and I'd be okay with just nuking those lines. > Another thing that caught my attention is the assumption that unsetting a > bit is so expensive that we have to first check if it's set, so we may as > well remove "IS_BRACKET(Np->Num)" as well. > > The attached is what I mean. I'll commit this this week unless there are > objections. > +1 looks good to me. regards, Ranier Vilela
