On Tue, 2023-01-03 at 16:25 +0530, vignesh C wrote: > ... > The patch does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a > rebased patch: >... > Regards, > Vignesh
Per conversation in thread listed below, patches have been submitted to the "Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends" thread https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bd57d9a4c219cc1392665fd5fba61dde8027b3da.ca...@crunchydata.com 0001-Add-tracking-of-backend-memory-allocated-to-pg_stat_.patch 0002-Add-the-ability-to-limit-the-amount-of-memory-that-c.patch On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 19:44, Reid Thompson <reid(dot)thompson(at)crunchydata(dot)com> wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-11-27 at 09:40 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > ... > > > I still wonder whether there needs to be a separate CF entry for > > > the 0001 patch. One issue is that there's two different lists of > > > people involved in the threads. > > > > > I'm OK with containing the conversation to one thread if everyone else > is. If there's no argument against, then patches after today will go > to the "Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be > allocated to backends" thread > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bd57d9a4c219cc1392665fd5fba61dde8027b3da.ca...@crunchydata.com -- Reid Thompson Senior Software Engineer Crunchy Data, Inc. reid.thomp...@crunchydata.com www.crunchydata.com