On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 05:28:47AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > Fields renaming was mandatory in the previous ones as there was > already a mix of with/without "n_" in the existing fields names. > > That said, I think it's better to rename the fields as you did (to > be "consistent" on the naming between relation/db stats), so the > patch LGTM.
Yeah, PgStat_StatDBEntry is the last one using this style, so I have kept my change with the variables renamed rather than painting more CppConcat()s. The functions are still named the same as the original ones. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
