On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 05:16:56PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Doing that in a separate patch is fine by me. > > I have applied the patch for the tab entries, then could not resist > poking at the parts for the db entries. This leads to more reduction > than the other one actually, as of: > 4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 447 deletions(-) > > Like the previous one, the functions have the same names and the field > names are updated to fit in the picture. Thoughts?
Likewise, is there a plan to add function generation macros for pg_stat_get_bgwriter, pg_stat_get_xact and so on? -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
