Em qui., 6 de out. de 2022 às 20:52, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
> Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes: > > So, any use of this GinTernaryValue are: > > > 1. if (key->entryRes[j]) be FALSE if GIN_FALSE > > 2. if (key->entryRes[j]) be TRUE if GIN_TRUE > > 3. if (key->entryRes[j]) be TRUE if GIN_MAYBE > > Yeah, that's how it's designed. Unless you can point to a bug, > I do not think we ought to change this code. > Thanks for answering. My main concerns is this point: /* If already matched on earlier page, do no extra work */ - if (key->entryRes[j]) + if (key->entryRes[j] == GIN_TRUE) continue; If GIN_MAYBE cases are erroneously ignored. regards, Ranier Vilela
