On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 03:56:32PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > +1, I think this is worth keeping in for 11. > > Okay, that's fine for me. Thanks for updating the documentation. > Perhaps it would be nicer for plugin developers to add a comment in > bgworker.h as well about what BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN allows to > achieve? > Yeah, that makes sense. Will add as well. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
