> On 22 Apr 2018, at 14:04, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz 
> <mailto:mich...@paquier.xyz>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN has been added by commit eed1ce7, which is an
> infrastructure piece to be able to enable and disable dynamically
> checksums on a cluster.  The main idea is to be able to bypass
> datallowconn which allows a background worker to connect to a database
> even if the database is set to refuse connections so as its checksums
> can be calculated and updated.
> 
> At the end, the dynamic switch for checksums has been reverted as of
> a228cc13, and a set of rather-used APIs have been changed for what looks
> like no reason now:
> - BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection
> - BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid
> - InitPostgres
> So all background workers would not be able to compile because of that.
> Would we want to drop this unused interface or keep it?
> 
> Even if this is not removed, bgworker.sgml needs to be updated with the
> new definition of BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection and
> BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid which are missing the third
> argument "uint32 flags", as well as the description for
> BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN.  I can personally see more reasons to revert
> that portion as well and consider it again for v12 or onwards if the
> on-line checksum switch is proposed again.
> 
> Magnus, Daniel, what do you think?
> 
> I think this feature is definitely worth keeping, regardless. It's useful 
> elsewhere, in externally maintained bgwriters.

+1, I think this is worth keeping in for 11.

cheers ./daniel

Reply via email to