At Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:19:22 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote in > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > There are basically two good reasons to back-patch comment changes: > > > > * fear that the comment is wrong enough to mislead people looking > > at the older branch; > > > > * fear that leaving it alone will create a merge hazard for future > > back-patches. > > > > It doesn't seem to me that either of those is a strong concern > > in this case. In the absence of these concerns, back-patching > > seems like make-work (and useless expenditure of buildfarm > > cycles). > > > > Agreed. I'll push this to HEAD after some time.
Thanks for committing, and for the clarification about back-patching policy! regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
