On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > > There are basically two good reasons to back-patch comment changes: > > * fear that the comment is wrong enough to mislead people looking > at the older branch; > > * fear that leaving it alone will create a merge hazard for future > back-patches. > > It doesn't seem to me that either of those is a strong concern > in this case. In the absence of these concerns, back-patching > seems like make-work (and useless expenditure of buildfarm > cycles). >
Agreed. I'll push this to HEAD after some time. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
