Dear Hou-san,

> I will dig your patch more, but I send partially to keep the activity of the 
> thread.

More minor comments about v28.

===
About 0002 

For 015_stream.pl

14. check_parallel_log

```
+# Check the log that the streamed transaction was completed successfully
+# reported by parallel apply worker.
+sub check_parallel_log
+{
+       my ($node_subscriber, $offset, $is_parallel)= @_;
+       my $parallel_message = 'finished processing the transaction finish 
command';
+
+       if ($is_parallel)
+       {
+               $node_subscriber->wait_for_log(qr/$parallel_message/, $offset);
+       }
+}
```

I think check_parallel_log() should be called only when streaming = 'parallel' 
and if-statement is not needed

===
For 016_stream_subxact.pl

15. test_streaming

```
+       INSERT INTO test_tab SELECT i, md5(i::text) FROM generate_series(    3, 
 500) s(i);
```

"    3" should be "3".

===
About 0003

For applyparallelworker.c

16. parallel_apply_relation_check()

```
+       if (rel->parallel_apply_safe == PARALLEL_APPLY_SAFETY_UNKNOWN)
+               logicalrep_rel_mark_parallel_apply(rel);
```

I was not clear when logicalrep_rel_mark_parallel_apply() is called here.
IIUC parallel_apply_relation_check() is called when parallel apply worker 
handles changes,
but before that relation is opened via logicalrep_rel_open() and 
parallel_apply_safe is set here.
If it guards some protocol violation, we may use Assert().

===
For create_subscription.sgml

17.
The restriction about foreign key does not seem to be documented.

===
About 0004

For 015_stream.pl

18. check_parallel_log

I heard that the removal has been reverted, but in the patch
check_parallel_log() is removed again... :-(


===
About throughout

I checked the test coverage via `make coverage`. About appluparallelworker.c 
and worker.c, both function coverage is 100%, and
line coverages are 86.2 % and 94.5 %. Generally it's good.
But I read the report and following parts seems not tested.

In parallel_apply_start_worker():

```
                if (tmp_winfo->error_mq_handle == NULL)
                {
                        /*
                         * Release the worker information and try next one if 
the parallel
                         * apply worker exited cleanly.
                         */
                        ParallelApplyWorkersList = 
foreach_delete_current(ParallelApplyWorkersList, lc);
                        shm_mq_detach(tmp_winfo->mq_handle);
                        dsm_detach(tmp_winfo->dsm_seg);
                        pfree(tmp_winfo);
                }
```

In HandleParallelApplyMessage():

```
                case 'X':                               /* Terminate, 
indicating clean exit */
                        {
                                shm_mq_detach(winfo->error_mq_handle);
                                winfo->error_mq_handle = NULL;
                                break;
                        }
```

Does it mean that we do not test the termination of parallel apply worker? If 
so I think it should be tested.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Reply via email to