On 8/31/22 3:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

On 2022-08-31 We 14:45, Tom Lane wrote:
To the extent that there was a management failure here, it was that
we didn't press for a resolution sooner.  Given the scale of the
concerns raised in June, I kind of agree with Andres' opinion that
fixing them post-freeze was doomed to failure.  It was definitely
doomed once we reached August with no real work done towards it.


I'm not going to comment publicly in general about this, you might
imagine what my reaction is. The decision is the RMT's to make and I
have no quarrel with that.

But I do want it understood that there was work being done right from
the time in June when Andres' complaints were published. These were
difficult issues, and we didn't let the grass grow looking for a fix. I
concede that might not have been visible until later.

June was a bit of a rough month too -- we had the issues that spawned the out-of-cycle release at the top of the month, which started almost right after Beta 1, and then almost immediately into Beta 2 after 14.4. I know that consumed a lot of my cycles. At that point in time for the v15 release process I was primarily focused on monitoring open items at that point, so I missed the June comments.

Jonathan

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to